Women's Boxing in the Olympics (2 Viewers)

Como

Well-Known Member
When you can not work out who is who the logical route is to move to open categories.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
When you can not work out who is who the logical route is to move to open categories.
A simple power rating would suffice in my opinion,not castigating a significant proportion of women who have been born ,lived as women,are women just on some dodgy russian federation say so and amplified by big smart don before the event,just like a stable genius,demi God,predicts event's does Don!
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
What nonsense.
Women's sport was created to exclude males and specifically male advantage.
Forget Russians and Donalds and focus on the issue.
If an individual is male they must be excluded from the women's category.
It is a regulatory body's actual job to protect that category by having entry requirements - most obviously a sex screening process.
The IOC has refused to do this. They have no interest in protecting the integrity of women's sport. They are happy to use birth certificates to include males in women's sport.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
What nonsense.
Women's sport was created to exclude males and specifically male advantage.
Forget Russians and Donalds and focus on the issue.
If an individual is male they must be excluded from the women's category.
It is a regulatory body's actual job to protect that category by having entry requirements - most obviously a sex screening process.
The IOC has refused to do this. They have no interest in protecting the integrity of women's sport. They are happy to use birth certificates to include males in women's sport.
And it still does,get a power co -iffecient and measure that if you want, but it's a women's sport and she is a woman, sorry, for your loss of Identity, natural all the way here!
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
What data would you need to confirm whether these athletes are male or female?
The IOC has chosen either to require no medical evidence and accept a birth certificate OR they have medical evidence which they have kept to themselves.
Both options demonstrate a failure to govern with any integrity.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
What data would you need to confirm whether these athletes are male or female?
The IOC has chosen either to require no medical evidence and accept a birth certificate OR they have medical evidence which they have kept to themselves.
Both options demonstrate a failure to govern with any integrity.
The release of the russian crap for a start and the handling back of the £100k from Gazprom!
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
The release of the russian crap for a start and the handling back of the £100k from Gazprom!
Neither action would settle the issue of whether the 2 boxers are male or female, which is the crux of the controversy.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Neither action would settle the issue of whether the 2 boxers are male or female, which is the crux of the controversy.
Well the £100k would be a start to prove she was genuine in her weird surrender in the fight,alleging a broken nose but on closer inspection that claim wasn't made again,the first question is enough to publicly hang Kalif,no evidence for me and the head of IAB SAID only testosterone levels were measured and confused but enough to disqualify her and the other boxer, she's not hermafridite Andy not trans, discredited from the IAB,god I may have been married to one of those described but four children later bruised knuckles from whaking me over the head!
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
No proof at all just the rantings of the governing body again IBA President.
Strange timing of this outburst?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Staged event, makes old Donny appear a sage,hmm whose next, fucking hell? dystopia!
Want to get out of this country?
Take your pick Russia's got opportunity I hear Israel too !
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
Yet again the point is being missed.
The facts about whether individuals are male or female can (and probably have) been established. The IOC have chosen to ignore the biology and go with the political decision that biology matters less than identity and inclusion.
It looks likely that IOC know but don't care whether these boxers are male or female.
Therefore, I repeat, this is a failure of governance. When this happens it opens the door to speculation and misinformation.
For my part I am not interested in Russian interference, Trump weaponising the issue, "he said, she said". The IOC should have established the facts. They have brought this on themselves and are a disgrace.
 

oakey

Well-Known Member

Evo1883

Well-Known Member

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member

Finally. Where have all the apologists for blatant cheating gone, I wonder.
Think you’ve been right on this
It’s really uncomfortable to try and manage a way through but you have to manage women competitive sport
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member

Finally. Where have all the apologists for blatant cheating gone, I wonder.
So transgender women (men) banned from competing against women. I don't know how that could ever be a discussion, but at least the correct conclusion.

Even better it seems Coventry had a hand in it too ;)
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Great news, only biological women should be able to compete in women’s sports. Anyone who disagrees is a creepy weirdo, it’s dangerous and unfair on actual women who train hard to have some man come along and break all the records
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
So transgender women (men) banned from competing against women. I don't know how that could ever be a discussion, but at least the correct conclusion.

Even better it seems Coventry had a hand in it too ;)
People born male clearly should always have been competing against others born male. The question of intersex people however is much more difficult to answer and that still needs addressing case by case.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top