Officiating (2 Viewers)

Ccfcisparks · Oct 4, 2025

Didn't think the ref was that bad

Sky Blue Goblin · Oct 4, 2025

Ref was decent I thought today outside of the handball. The linesman however

Mercian In Anglia · Oct 4, 2025

Skyblue Bangkok said:
Definitely the one against Millwall, today not sure.

Agree the Millwall one was clearer, but thought the Wed lad leaned into the ball with his arm, rather than it just hitting him with his arm by his side.

I'm sure I'll get over it!

Ricketts · Oct 4, 2025

Definitely handball, ref seemed to have a good view.
As for the offside, I can only assume the lino thought it went straight in. I did at first.

shmmeee · Oct 4, 2025

PLAY UP POMPEY POMPEY PLAY UP

Mcbean · Oct 4, 2025

I thought Bobby got it before Wright got there

Johhny Blue · Oct 4, 2025

Sky Blue Goblin said:
Ref was decent I thought today outside of the handball. The linesman however

He couldn’t flag Hadji’s goal because he only had one flag

Warwickhunt · Oct 4, 2025

Two city players were blocking the linesman view of Wright and it looks like it went straight in.

Hobo · Oct 5, 2025

Let’s face it VAR has made worse decisions than that linesman even after the benefit of countless replays.

Skyblue Bangkok · Oct 5, 2025

Hobo said:
Let’s face it VAR has made worse decisions than that linesman even after the benefit of countless replays.

Did you see the Celtic goal disallowed the other night?The ball clearly comes off the Celtic players face , yet VAR claims it hit his arm, worst VAR decision I've ever seen.

Adge · Oct 5, 2025

Shannerz said:
The only possible explanation is that he thought it went straight in.

This. A clear lack of team communication resulted in the goal being given. The referee needs to step in there as the linesman can be forgiven for seeing it go (so he thinks) straight in. The Referee who is nearer has to see that it has been put in by Wright.

Skyblue Bangkok · Oct 5, 2025

Adge said:
This. A clear lack of team communication resulted in the goal being given. The referee needs to step in there as the linesman can be forgiven for seeing it go (so he thinks) straight in. The Referee who is nearer has to see that it has been put in by Wright.

They are human , mistakes happen , some of you on here seem to think no mistakes ever happen.

Adge · Oct 5, 2025

Skyblue Bangkok said:
They are human , mistakes happen , some of you on here seem to think no mistakes ever happen.

Not a criticism-just balancing it why it was possible the Assistant didn’t raise his flag.

Nick · Friday at 10:11 PM

One goal offside, the other after a clear foul on tats.

Ref didn't want to give us a thing all second half.

lifeskyblue · Friday at 11:20 PM

I thought all the goals legitimate. Not convinced there was enough in the challenge on Tats before their third. I would have been annoyed if given against us

pusbccfc · Friday at 11:21 PM

The worst decision tonight was missing the yellow card for that foul on Tats. Hes turned two defenders and would have been well away into their half. One of many poor decisions.

David O'Day · Friday at 11:55 PM

lifeskyblue said:
I thought all the goals legitimate. Not convinced there was enough in the challenge on Tats before their third. I would have been annoyed if given against us

he's fouled him twice, if he needs to be fouled more than that then it's rugby not football

David O'Day · Friday at 11:56 PM

pusbccfc said:
The worst decision tonight was missing the yellow card for that foul on Tats. Hes turned two defenders and would have been well away into their half. One of many poor decisions.

Moore also hacks down a player on a yellow and ref doesn't even give a foul

And before any fun sponge says anything being shite and the ref being are not mutually exclusive things

pusbccfc · Friday at 11:56 PM

David O'Day said:
Moore also hacks down a player on a yellow and ref doesn't even give a foul

And before any fun sponge says anything being shite and the ref being are not mutually exclusive things

Be careful, he'll come for you tomorrow morning.

David O'Day · Friday at 11:59 PM

pusbccfc said:
Be careful, he'll come for you tomorrow morning.

Kiefer Moore?

pusbccfc · Saturday at 12:01 AM

David O'Day said:
Kiefer Moore?

You wish. It will be Sparky.

rob9872 · Saturday at 12:06 AM

Ref was a c**t

David O'Day · Saturday at 12:40 AM

pusbccfc said:
You wish. It will be Sparky.

trembling

far to gleeful that we lost that one

hinckley cov · Saturday at 12:47 AM

Cant blame the referee for our bloody amateur defending.

skyblue_55 · Saturday at 12:59 AM

The linesman 2nd half couldn’t keep up with play …… he missed the offsides & didn’t flag for the play acting/diving ….he needn’t have bothered turning up !

Dougin · Saturday at 5:49 AM

Ref was sound, offside goal too close to call with naked eye, one on Saka wasn’t a foul.

mason clarke should of gone down when sheaf pulled him back in centre circle would have been a definate 2nd yellow we would of gone on to win .

Terry Gibson's perm · Saturday at 7:10 AM

The ref seemed to enjoy his second half and got excited by the crowd, how the bloke on the right hand side didn’t get booked for diving I have no idea. Sheaf should have had a second yellow for the pull back on EMC you shouldn’t need to go over to get these decisions.

jim20 · Saturday at 6:32 PM

I’ve watched the replays of the Saka incident which led to their goal, and if that’s not a foul then we should start doing it! He’s practically ripping Sakas shirt off, after pushing him. He’s pulls him down, clear as day. If he wasn’t pulling his shirt Saka wouldn’t have gone down

Hobo · Saturday at 6:37 PM

Nick said:
One goal offside, the other after a clear foul on tats.

Ref didn't want to give us a thing all second half.

I don't think any of the goals were offside and it definitely wasn't a foul on Tats.

Sky Blue Pete · Saturday at 6:43 PM

jim20 said:
I’ve watched the replays of the Saka incident which led to their goal, and if that’s not a foul then we should start doing it! He’s practically ripping Sakas shirt off, after pushing him. He’s pulls him down, clear as day. If he wasn’t pulling his shirt Saka wouldn’t have gone down

It was a foul but he was quite consistent not allowing people to just go down and win a free kick

Frostie · Saturday at 9:32 PM

Hobo said:
it definitely wasn't a foul on Tats.

Really?

Nick · Saturday at 9:34 PM

Nah no foul

Hobo · Sunday at 7:25 PM

Tats had hold of the other players shorts and was already off balance before any contact. No foul. Take your sky blue glasses off.

Johhny Blue · Sunday at 7:47 PM

jim20 said:
I’ve watched the replays of the Saka incident which led to their goal, and if that’s not a foul then we should start doing it! He’s practically ripping Sakas shirt off, after pushing him. He’s pulls him down, clear as day. If he wasn’t pulling his shirt Saka wouldn’t have gone down

Promise us you won’t ever become a ref.

shmmeee · Sunday at 8:03 PM

Hobo said:
Tats had hold of the other players shorts and was already off balance before any contact. No foul. Take your sky blue glasses off.

Did you not see the video? The guy had Sakamoto by the neck the entire time!

Officiating (2 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread