Congratulations England women (2 Viewers)

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
I get your point, but a boys team thrashed Switzerland before the tournament , same happened to Spain and the US women's teams a few years ago. I've heard some say they showed the men how to win, ignoring the fact it's of a very poor quality and the goalkeeping is comedy gold.
Such a shit take. That's like saying you wouldn't watch the Women's 100M Olympic final because none of them are as quick as the men.

Men have biological physical advantages making them stronger and quicker, so fucking what? I wouldn't mind betting that each of the 'comedy goalkeepers' would save each and every penalty you could take against them though.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Such a shit take. That's like saying you wouldn't watch the Women's 100M Olympic final because none of them are as quick as the men.

Men have biological physical advantages making them stronger and quicker, so fucking what? I wouldn't mind betting that each of the 'comedy goalkeepers' would save each and every penalty you could take against them though.
Not to mention that to get to the shootout most of them have played 2 hours plus stoppages, which is probably beyond most on this forum.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Watched a bit while I was out for dinner last night. Probably the most women’s football I’ve watched. The quality was poor and completely lacking pace and power but there was something refreshingly honest about the game TBH. I enjoyed it. Didn’t see past 90 min tho.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
Over the tournament but I didn't see too much in the way of comedy goalkeeping so hopefully that cliche soon becomes the sole realm of tiresome wags who look forward to them swapping shirts after the game lol etc
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
You can't compare it to the mens game, just like in most other physical sports, and weather or not we like it or even watched it is personal choice. Surely though we can all be happy that OUR girls have beaten other girls in their specialist sport, so jolly well done to them.
 

oneofourown

Active Member
If you just see it for what it is, the women's England national team winning the Euro's it's amazing, the problem is when you compare it to the men's game, which we all do.
I couldn't believe how biased the BBC commentators and pundits were. They were saying 'that's not a foul' only for the replay to show studs up, it happened a few times.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
If you just see it for what it is, the women's England national team winning the Euro's it's amazing, the problem is when you compare it to the men's game, which we all do.
I couldn't believe how biased the BBC commentators and pundits were. They were saying 'that's not a foul' only for the replay to show studs up, it happened a few times.
Yeah, there's a lot of naivety and amateurism in the commentaries unfortunately.

It will take time and they will get better. We can't knock the achievement of the girls though. That was a real grind your teeth and battle through the rounds, tournament for them and through adversity, they pulled through.

Never thought they would do it to be honest .

They did us proud. ❤️
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
Enjoyed it and pleased they won.

I think I'd be more invested though if some Cov connection either by birth or playing for Cov Ladies or something. Even now I find myself as interested in what Jodi Jones did for Malta or Vik for Sweden as I do the England team, who I watched more closely when Wilson or Madders have played.
One of the girls (Mead) came from Warwick and is a Cov fan i believe.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Good win, and they have defended the title which is a fantastic achievement.

I just cant enjoy it though, having been a huge advocate of girls and women's football for years, the poor way my daughter was treated at a Women's Super League teams academy has destroyed my enthusiasm.
I'm not saying it hasn't happened/or doesn't happen in men's football, but the academy set ups in Women's football have some catching up on the way they treat our younger players.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
I'm not even English and even I felt a little emotional at the end.

Good on them - arguably the Spanish have been the better side in the tournament but the Lionesses just don't lie down and fight for everything - kudos to them. Kelly was great, Carter was great and Hampton was superb. I'm pleased for all of them :)

And for those who moan that it's not like mens football - it's not. Just don't watch it if you're expecting the same. It's come on leaps and bounds in the last 10 years and will continue do so. Leave it alone if it triggers you that much.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Post #17 - you literally compared it to Bowls & Rugby Union!!

Er no I said that it generates the same emotional reaction. I didn’t compare the sport.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Comparisons between the men’s and women’s teams are inevitable really. I know it upsets some people for some precious reason and some of them go overboard but it should hardly come as a surprise.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Comparisons between the men’s and women’s teams are inevitable really. I know it upsets some people for some precious reason and some of them go overboard but it should hardly come as a surprise.

Why? I don’t see the comparisons in other sports.
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
Watched a bit while I was out for dinner last night. Probably the most women’s football I’ve watched. The quality was poor and completely lacking pace and power but there was something refreshingly honest about the game TBH. I enjoyed it. Didn’t see past 90 min tho.
Hi shmmeee I've watched a load of shite in div 1 worse than that😉 some of the girls have good skills not all but some, maybe Simms could learn how to hold the ball and bring people into play from some of them🤣🤣
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
If you just see it for what it is, the women's England national team winning the Euro's it's amazing, the problem is when you compare it to the men's game, which we all do.
I couldn't believe how biased the BBC commentators and pundits were. They were saying 'that's not a foul' only for the replay to show studs up, it happened a few times.

It's incomparable. Our U18s would beat the Lionesses by a complete landslide. In many ways it's a different sport entirely.

That's not a negative on the women though, just let them develop and expand the sport at their own pace.

The only crap I can't stomach is when morons try to push the equal pay agenda.

In terms of revenue for the 23/24 season combined revenue for the WSL was around £65m . Aggregate revenue for 23/24 for Championship clubs was £958m. Pretty obvious why they're paid less, and rightfully so.
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
ah must be true then


Great argument - Well respected, world renowned right back, and known tough cookie, lying on National TV...really ?
So if she showed her x-ray, would the radiographers be lying too ?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

chiefdave

Well-Known Member

Great argument - Well respected, world renowned right back, and known tough cookie, lying on National TV...really ?
So if she showed her x-ray, would the radiographers be lying too ?
Probably just down to definition of fracture, none of us know how severe the injury is. We tend to think broken leg as Busst style and still playing but that's not reality.

Heard an interview with one of the England Mens cricket team physios talking about why so many players now get stress fractures and he said it simply a case of better scanning. He said in the past they wouldn't have been detected and people would have kept playing and it would only be dealt with if and when it became an issue.

Said there was a debate in the medical community if team doctors and being overly cautious and taking people out of action for months for things they would have played through in the past.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Why? I don’t see the comparisons in other sports.
Because it’s a high profile team sport where there’s considerable overlap between the ways both the men’s game and women’s games are presented, and where (unlike many other sports) teams/tournaments are run by the same organisations. I really don’t see why making comparisons between the two is so upsetting to some people.
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
Probably just down to definition of fracture, none of us know how severe the injury is. We tend to think broken leg as Busst style and still playing but that's not reality.

Heard an interview with one of the England Mens cricket team physios talking about why so many players now get stress fractures and he said it simply a case of better scanning. He said in the past they wouldn't have been detected and people would have kept playing and it would only be dealt with if and when it became an issue.

Said there was a debate in the medical community if team doctors and being overly cautious and taking people out of action for months for things they would have played through in the past.
Absolutely agree with you that the injury was most likely a stress fracture - still painful though.
And yes, a 'break' is absolutely not the same as a 'fracture', and then there are varying degrees of 'fractures' too.
I played a lot of sport (football, squash, badminton) when i was younger and had bad shin splints for years.
One of the causes of shin splints is stress fractures of the tibia, and my shins were really painful days after playing, but it didn't stop me playing week in and week out.
My 'beef' with ptr about this issue, is that he thinks Bronze was lying.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top