This isn’t correct Fernando. Last season, he scored 4 of his goals playing LW out of 12. 2 v Oxford, 1 v Blackburn and Plymouth away.
We played 5-3-2 v Leeds, PNE, QPR, Luton, Boro, Derby and Sunderland where Haji scored 4 goals. Then post-Lampard, scored 3 v Sunderland and another v Burnley in a 4-2-3-1.
If you itemise his goals in 23/24, it’s a similar pattern. Scored 4 before we switched to 4-2-3-1 (PNE, Boro and Blackburn), scored 6 from the wing in the league and the epic winner v Wolves, totalling 7. Even his goals v Sheff W and Man U, he played as a striker because we played 3-4-1-2 v Man U.
Haji’s goals v Watford and Huddersfield (3), we played 3-4-1-2 post-Sakamoto injury and against Millwall, he scored 2 playing as a lone striker in a 4-2-3-1.
See Transfermarkt (attached) and the reason 3 of his goals aren’t credited as playing CF because he was substituted on for Simms v Boro and Blackburn (3-4-1-2) and on for COH v WBA (switched from 3-4-2-1 to 3-4-1-2).
Therefore, the final tally is 12 goals as a striker, 7 goals as a LW. Adjusting for his 4 penalty goals, it’s still 8 goals v 7 in 6 less games.
The conversation that should be taking place is not whether or not Haji’s best position is LW or striker… It’s whether or not he is better as a striker in a 2 or a one. Which is an entirely different topic of conversation.