5 in Plymouth just a couple of years ago from an INCEL. Look at the Cult of Tate too, he has a few supporters on here who see him as some sort of hero. Even over the weekend Hannah Waddington had to tell a photographer on the red carpet where to go because he asked her to show some leg. It’s behaviour towards women that shouldn’t ever have been allowed to go unchallenged and certainly not in today’s society. That photographer should be arrested for harassment and not allowed to be near a red carpet again. We need to call it out at every level because if we don’t we just legitimise it, mix that with mental health issues and events like Sydney and Plymouth are going to become more and more common.
A bit harsh.
I would just stick him on bereavement notices, or lost and found pets, for a year or two
Jokes on page two because people can't use it as an excuse to flaunt their racism. Although a few managed it early on.
You do understand that finding someone calling out misogamy funny you’re proving my point. What’s up? Do you not have any women in your life that you respect? A grandmother? Mother? Sister? Wife? Daughter? If you did I suspect that you wouldn’t find them being asked to flash a body part funny or someone calling that pattern of behaviour out funny. If someone is willing to do that in front of a crowd to someone with a profile imagine what they’re thinking behind closed doors. Why did that “man” feel empowered to do it in the first place? Probably because people like you find him being called out funny, he thinks everywhere is a safe space to behave like that only because enough turn a blind eye to it and empower him and others like him to do it.
If there is racism then report it and get the posters banned. From what I can see it is some people thinking the attack had a different motive to what it actually did. Not really any kind of crime, and not really anything surprising given that an attack like this is the usual modus operandi of ISIS et al, who have also issued direct warnings recently at the west that they were going to attack.
Ha ha....yep. you're right tony. Carry on. Arrest him. Quick.
Crime won't crack itself......
It's obviously wrong, but I can't see you can arrest someone for it.
At best, he should lose his job.
There's been a few incel killing sprees in North America as well.
There are currently sexual harassment laws in place that they could arrest him under. To the government’s credit there is currently a bill going through parliament to strengthen those laws especially against catcalling and street harassment. You may be right in thinking that as the law stands there might not be enough to prosecute but there might be enough to arrest and question should a complaint be made. The real shame is that we need these laws in the first place. Just shouldn’t be like that.
The title INCEL tells you everything you need to know about these men. It’s self titled, it’s not something that has been bestowed on them by media, the police or governments. These “men” are literally saying that they are involuntary celibate because women haven’t done their jobs by volunteering to fulfil their needs. It’s pure entitlement dangerously linked with anger and part of the wider problem of misogyny.
3 days into this thread and we're talking about Hannah Waddingham and Pizza Hut buffets.
3 days into the Israel/Palestine thread anyone saying Israel isn't squeaky clean were accused of being terrorist sympathisers.
If you ignore the 4,000 posts in that thread then sure, not a single post generated on the topic.
Er the thread wasn’t started until Israel retaliated
I dont think the attack on the Iranian consulate which it was in response to did either.
At the end of the day, both repulsive regimes.
Not sure ifI heard right, but I thought it said on the radio the attacker is 15.
So you was one of the people who had nothing to say then. Ironically. Even when you did join the conversation it wasn’t to condemn either side it was to argue over what does or doesn’t constitute a terrorist organisation.
Tbf mate you are close. Surprised you don’t say cuck in a post for once
Same weapons eveytime
I’m talking about comparable attacks to this one - October 7 is obviously something completely different
Well for a start that would require the forum administrator to ban himself. It’s fine for people to admit that they profiled the killer here based on the ‘MO’ and location. Seems to be some reluctance to do that for some reason.
Maybe if people are going to be wrong this often they need to change their preconceptions about who the “usual” perpetrators are.
The MO wasn't a 100% match though either to be fair. They fact he seems to have already been at the location left and then came back armed is not a perfect match for "terrorism".
