Coronavirus (3 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
SARS: Key Events
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) was first discovered in Asia in February 2003. The outbreak lasted approximately six months as the disease spread to more than two dozen countries in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia before it was stopped in July 2003. See below a timeline of CDC’s key activities conducted during the outbreak and beyond.

2002
November 16: The first case of atypical pneumonia is reported in the Guangdong province in southern China.

Top of Page
2003
March 12: The World Health Organization (WHO) issues a global alert for a severe form of pneumonia of unknown origin in persons from China, Vietnam, and Hong Kong.

March 14: CDC activated its Emergency Operations Center (EOC).

March 15: CDC issues first health alert and hosts media telebriefing about an atypical pneumonia that has been named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). CDC issues interim guidelines for state and local health departments on SARS.

CDC issues a “Health Alert Notice” for travelers to the United States from Hong Kong, Guangdong Province (China).

March 20: CDC issues infection control precautions for aerosol-generating procedures on patients who are suspected of having SARS.

March 22: CDC issues interim laboratory biosafety guidelines for handling and processing specimens associated with SARS.

March 24: CDC laboratory analysis suggests a new coronavirus may be the cause of SARS. In the United States, 39 suspect cases (to date) had been identified. Of those cases, 32 of 39 had traveled to countries were SARS was reported.

March 27: CDC issues interim domestic guidelines for management of exposures to SARS for healthcare and other institutional settings.

March 28: The SARs outbreak is more widespread. CDC begins utilizing pandemic planning for SARS.

March 29: CDC extended its travel advisory for SARS to include all of mainland China and added Singapore. CDC quarantine staff began meeting planes, cargo ships and cruise ships coming either directly or indirectly to the United States from China, Singapore and Vietnam and also begins distributing health alert cards to travelers.

April 4: The number of suspected U.S. SARS cases was 115; reported from 29 states. There were no deaths among these suspect cases of SARS in the United States.

April 5: CDC establishes community outreach team to address stigmatization associated with SARS.

April 10: CDC issued specific guidance for students exposed to SARS.

April 14: CDC publishes a sequence of the virus believed to be responsible for the global epidemic of SARS. Identifying the genetic sequence of a new virus is important to treatment and prevention efforts. The results came just 12 days after a team of scientists and technicians began working around the clock to grow cells taken from the throat culture of a SARS patient.

April 22: CDC issues a health alert for travelers to Toronto, Ontario (Canada)

May 6: In the United States, no new probable cases were reported in the last 24 hours, and there was no evidence of ongoing transmission beyond the initial case reports in travelers for more than 20 days. The containment in the United States has been successful.

May 20: CDC lifted the travel alert on Toronto because more than 30 days (or three SARS incubation periods) had elapsed since the date of onset of symptoms for the last reported case.

May 23: CDC reinstated travel alert for Toronto because on May 22, Canadian health officials reported a cluster of five new probable SARS cases.

June 4: CDC removed the travel alert for Singapore and downgraded the traveler notification for Hong Kong from a travel advisory to a travel alert.

July 3: CDC removed the travel alert for mainland China.

July 5: WHO announced that the global SARS outbreak was contained.

July 10: CDC removed the travel alert for Hong Kong and Toronto.

July 15: CDC removed the travel alert for Taiwan.

July 17: CDC updated the SARS case definition which reduced the number of U.S. cases by half. The change results from excluding cases in which blood specimens that were collected more than 21 days after the onset of illness test negative.

December 31: Globally, WHO received reports of SARS from 29 countries and regions; 8,096 persons with probable SARS resulting in 774 deaths. In the United States, eight SARS infections were documented by laboratory testing and an additional 19 probable SARS infections were reported.

Top of Page
2004
January 13: CDC issues “Notice of Embargo of Civets.” A SARS-like virus had been isolated from civets (captured in areas of China where the SARS outbreak originated). CDC banned the importation of civets. The civet is a mammal with a catlike body, long legs, a long tail, and a masked face resembling a raccoon or weasel. The ban is currently still in effect.

Top of Page
2012
October 5: The National Select Agent Registry Program declared SARS-coronavirus a select agent. A select agent is a bacterium, virus or toxin that has the potential to pose a severe threat to public health and safety.

Page last reviewed: April 26, 2013
About CDC 24-7
Advisory Committees
plus icon
Leadership
plus icon
Speakers Bureau
plus icon
CDC Organization
plus icon
A Bold Promise to the Nation
plus icon
Fact of the Week
plus icon
Business Practices
plus icon
Laboratory Science & Safety
Diversity and Inclusion Management
History
More About CDC
plus icon
Features Media
Social_round_rssSign up for Features
Get Email Updates
To receive email updates about this page, enter your email
 

Nick

Administrator
Chinese people are throwing their pets from their high rise flats in case they give them the virus.

Cunts.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Some razy lacism on show here
 

derbyskyblue

Well-Known Member
seen some crazy video of a nurse in wuhan saying 90,000 now infected, could hear gunshots in the background like a coup de grac for some poor fookas.
 

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Well that would be a tragedy. But we can be sure that there are still only two cases confirmed in the UK, and long may that continue. But if China aren't going to be able to control the number of cases, we are going to have to stop any travel from there very soon.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Well that would be a tragedy. But we can be sure that there are still only two cases confirmed in the UK, and long may that continue. But if China aren't going to be able to control the number of cases, we are going to have to stop any travel from there very soon.
Recession would kill more than the virus I’m advised
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
2% mortality rate
Less than influenza .
The issue is it's more contagious.
Seems like a stick for some China bashing
They may have failed in some aspects in response but I've seen some muddled reaction here from our own authorities.
If it had broken out here would we have been more successful in containing it
I don't think so myself .
Governments in the west afraid to Govern on issues like this, entitled masses moaning about poor food on cruise ships etc .
 
Last edited:

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
2% mortality rate
Less than influenza .
The issue is it's more contagious.
Seems like a stick for some China bashing
They may have failed in some aspects in response but I've seen some muddled reaction here from our own authorities.
If it had broken out here would we have been more successful in contains it
I don't think so myself .
Governments in the west afraid to Govern on issues like this, entitled masses moaning about poor food on cruise ships etc .

Yeah it's actually quite a week virus but it's as you say a good excuse for some prick sto bvash foreigners
 

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
That seems to be the only news story on it currently. Fuelled by the need to fill column-inches or radio minutes.
The headline mortality rate is unlikely to be anywhere near the 2% total deaths currently, who are the most susceptible to severe infection.
It also appears to be proving LESS easy to catch than standard flu strains.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
That seems to be the only news story on it currently. Fuelled by the need to fill column-inches or radio minutes.
The headline mortality rate is unlikely to be anywhere near the 2% total deaths currently, who are the most susceptible to severe infection.
It also appears to be proving LESS easy to catch than standard flu strains.
Sorry I may have it wrong
It is 4 times less likely to kill than SARS ,yet seems roughly 4 times as transmittable,in a third of that duration.
Is the. Length of incubation period likely to change the flu stat ,or the mortality rate to escalate?
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I don't understand the logic of getting people out of Wuhan/China en masse?

Surely it's better to contain them there? Now it's all over the place.

Plus Aircraft A/C is a cesspit for germs and viruses, so will infect people later down the line.
 
Last edited:

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
OK, so PHE have revised their advice, and it may affect some of you if you have been on holiday to Asia recently.

"UK Chief Medical Officers are advising anyone who has travelled to the UK from mainland China, Thailand, Japan, Republic of Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia or Macau in the last 14 days and is experiencing cough or fever or shortness of breath, to stay indoors and call NHS 111, even if symptoms are mild".
 
Last edited:

wingy

Well-Known Member
Been going well on that Cruiser.
Out foreign office excelling as ever in it's clear prompt activity.
 

SkyBlueCharlie9

Well-Known Member
The Sun is helpfully calling it the Snake Flu! (For clarification it's a scummy rag and I glanced at in the barbers the other day)
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
The tiddlywinks are going to be the end of us, should have banned all travel while we had the chance.

WHO cannot be trusted.
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
I just hope all those dead people don't turn into zombies! Wasn't the Walking Dead centered around some sort of virus kicking off?
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
The CCP lost control near enough straight away, WHO were too busy lining their own pockets to tell us the truth, suppose it had nothing to do with the CCP investing vast sums into the home country of the director general of the WHO.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top