CWR (2 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I’m sure people don’t need him to make up their minds for them.

He spouts utter bollocks as does @coventry_views
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
I know that the point of his account is set up to save the club - if everyone followed his advice of not attending games at St.Andrews there simply wouldn’t be a club or not much of one anyway
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I know that the point of his account is set up to save the club - if everyone followed his advice of not attending games at St.Andrews there simply wouldn’t be a club or not much of one anyway

He’s an imbecile
 

Nick

Administrator
Andy Turner is still spinning the shit out of "We aren't coming back to the Ricoh" even though nobody actually said we were.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
PSB_Group should be banned from twitter - the guy is a tool. Unfortunately everyone plays up to him.

ive has arguments with him over ticket prices. Has he ever commented on the indemnity clause?
 

SkyBlueCRJ

Well-Known Member
Andy Turner is still spinning the shit out of "We aren't coming back to the Ricoh" even though nobody actually said we were.

These are becoming beyond pathetic. Andy Turner is literally reeling out the same story just reworded slightly on a weekly basis now.
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
Andy Turner is still spinning the shit out of "We aren't coming back to the Ricoh" even though nobody actually said we were.
Has he said “5 reasons why” we’re not?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Emailed Rupert Lowe again today please be encouraged to do the same

[email protected]

asking whether the complaint can be ignored, how long till a decision made on whether there is a case to answer and does our leaving the Eu mean the complaint has no basis
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
Can someone please respond to Neil White as he’s just phoned in to the Radio CWR?
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
The usual spiel that we’ve all heard. “We are normal fans and have 2000 odd members and want the club to be open/transparent blah blah blah”
 

Buster

Well-Known Member
Isn't that the whole point? Getting as many of us on as possible to (a) monopolise the phone-in with the questions that need to be asked, and (b) make it look like Pete isn't just some random pro-SISU frother?
Well done all - i wonder how long Linnell and co can keep this up? Are they making sure Linnell does the phone-in, as Eakin would probably say something embarrassing?
That’s coordination
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I’m confused at the statement. Boddy has said they are talking as wasps and ccfc and ccfc have put out a joint statement saying that they signed an agreement not to take any further legal action but can’t sign the indemnity clause. What does the trust want? I don’t understand
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
I’m confused at the statement. Boddy has said they are talking as wasps and ccfc and ccfc have put out a joint statement saying that they signed an agreement not to take any further legal action but can’t sign the indemnity clause. What does the trust want? I don’t understand

Whatever the other parties want them to say
 

Nick

Administrator
I’m confused at the statement. Boddy has said they are talking as wasps and ccfc and ccfc have put out a joint statement saying that they signed an agreement not to take any further legal action but can’t sign the indemnity clause. What does the trust want? I don’t understand
They want to distract and mislead away from the indemnity clause.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The usual spiel that we’ve all heard. “We are normal fans and have 2000 odd members and want the club to be open/transparent blah blah blah”
What a joke. Refuse to tell their own members what they are up to and what happens in their meetings but demands transparency from others.
This is just a coordinated backlash following petes opinion being voiced on cwr
Spot on. Couple of calls to CWR questioning Wasps and we've seen the social media accounts fire up and now the Trust.

Was only a few days again Neil was saying they were too busy to issue statements, that it would need to be their full time job for them to do that.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
The usual spiel that we’ve all heard. “We are normal fans and have 2000 odd members and want the club to be open/transparent blah blah blah”

Wasn’t it 4,000 members at one point?
 

Nick

Administrator
What a joke. Refuse to tell their own members what they are up to and what happens in their meetings but demands transparency from others.

Spot on. Couple of calls to CWR questioning Wasps and we've seen the social media accounts fire up and now the Trust.

Was only a few days again Neil was saying they were too busy to issue statements, that it would need to be their full time job for them to do that.
The irony is hilarious.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
How many phone ins does this station have?
After games and Monday and Friday

now I’m on it there’s no way I’m letting Stuart off the hook about Eu complaint being kicked and the indemnity clause. I’m happy that there comes a time to push boddy but now is not that time
 

Paul Anthony

Well-Known Member
They want to distract and mislead away from the indemnity clause.

Exactly. Classic distraction techniques the kind of which are used in politics every day of the week. When something's going on that you want to divert people's attention away from, this is exactly the kind of game to play.

Trouble is people buy it.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Emailed Rupert Lowe again today please be encouraged to do the same

[email protected]

asking whether the complaint can be ignored, how long till a decision made on whether there is a case to answer and does our leaving the Eu mean the complaint has no basis

Cant answer the first, expect the answer to the second to be “usually takes between six months and two years, we will not be told until it happens” or similar. Third is entirely dependent on the deal we strike this year from what I understand. As potential breach was while we were in the EU I don’t think that matters but who enforces the decision I think will depend on what we agree this year. That’s how I parsed the article I read on it. Fact is no one really knows because no one has left before.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Cant answer the first, expect the answer to the second to be “usually takes between six months and two years, we will not be told until it happens” or similar. Third is entirely dependent on the deal we strike this year from what I understand. As potential breach was while we were in the EU I don’t think that matters but who enforces the decision I think will depend on what we agree this year. That’s how I parsed the article I read on it. Fact is no one really knows because no one has left before.
Yep
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
The EU sees all things as a breach of a level playing field and will follow it to its death whether we are in or out of Europe, most of the trade deal from EU will be to ensure a level playing field as they will not like competition
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top