Nick
Administrator
It was asking the club and owners to indemnify if wasps and parties needed to pay out.
The fact is ignored by media and the trust is telling.
CWR (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
The fact is ignored by media and the trust is telling.
mark82
Moderator
Think even Wasps have said they'd want indemnifying.
Nick
Administrator
Strange that the telegraph were trying to push something as well earlier.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
They always let sam and I on when we phone
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
So they don’t want to be back in Coventry then
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Can’t be at the moment
pastythegreat
Well-Known Member
Well for most (unless your part of the trust, the council or their followers) it's not as black and white as that is it?! Or is it? Maybe it is. Because if the only way of a return to Coventry is as a tenant to London W**ps then no, I dont want to be back in Coventry.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
So you want to stay in Birmingham indefinitely
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
They’ve backed themselves into a corner with this rhetoric, same as Wasps have with their apparent misunderstanding of EU law.
Fucking egos man. Problem from the start on all sides.
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
Perhaps the Media should ask Wycombe what they thought about the LONDON Wasps nesting in their ground and then fucking off into the Sunset. Perhaps Eakin should get a Wasp london fan on and ask them what they think about it!
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He didn’t say that but the reality is only one side can change their stance now and it’s not Sisu or that’s the reality
Nick
Administrator
No, it was a bloke called Ricky who had no interest in the game and rang up to go on about that.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I know all that what I can’t understand is one that some on here don’t want to go back to the Ricoh full stop and two there are others who don’t want to go back to the Ricoh as Tennants. They are in the minority, but will always say they know loads of people that agree with them, well I know loads that don’t.
pastythegreat
Well-Known Member
Not necessarily no. We could try Nuneaton? Leicester? Sixfields again?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Again though none of this matters as we can’t go back unless one side changes it’s stance
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I just heard some bloke say Pete was out of order
Nick
Administrator
He said it was easy to get to Brum and I think he said something making out people aren't fans if they don't go
SBAndy
Well-Known Member
Haven’t listened to it but I do know that there was a chap called Ricky that was (and maybe still is) very close to the Trust.
Nick
Administrator
No opinions on the game that just happened though on a call in after it. .
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Its those one or two I mean. Spent so long virtue signalling about hating Wasps and the Ricoh they now have to back the club not returning to the city. Insane.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Wouldn't that mean the club ceasing to exist?
Exactly, Wasps might think £5m a season is fair but the club aren't going to sign up to it. Shouldn't just be one side dictating terms.
Is there something about to come out? We've had Wasps piping up recently. Duggins in the Telegraph today and now Eakin.
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
I don’t mind coming back as tenants as long as we’re in control of football revenue, and we’re recognised in the name sponsorship.
if not I’d rather wait it out. Ultimately Grendel is right. Only one party can change their mind and it isn’t SISU. It’s there where pressure should be exerted. But the trust and local media don’t seem to want to
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
What’s Duggins saying now?
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Wasps can't do anything its up to the club.
pastythegreat
Well-Known Member
Its nothing to do with backing the Club not returning to the City. Its realising that it's currently not possible.
A) The council made sure we couldn't play at BPA.
B) London W**ps and SISU have made sure we camt play at the Ricoh.
How is any of this the "fans virtue signalling"? My club has been forced out of its City through many reasons//parties wrongdoing. I will support them and keep them alive as best I can. Me not wanting to return to the ricoh is as much about looking out for the welfare of CCFC and not wishing them in to a deal they cant afford as much as it is about hating London W**ps. Yes I hate W**ps and dont want to line their pockets by paying them rent or giving them a better chance of a bigger stadium sponsor by us being there, but I dont want us to return to the ricoh and damage the club by a) having to sign any indemnity to w**ps b) affecting our style of football playing on a ploughed field every week c) being made to feel unwelcome in our own home/city.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Ironic given the trust virtue signalling under a certain John Fletcher meant they have alienated the club and made it a fringe protest group - but like his beloved Labour Party
Any normal Trust would now resign itself to supporting the club - considering it I’m reality is now about 10 people include muppets like Lionel it’s now a joke and should rename itself the Garry Hoffman appreciation society
christonabike
Well-Known Member
Ricky is the half wit who used to ring up pissed talking about how much he lives and breathes the City. Then gets asked did he go today and he says no I listened to it in the radio. A complete bore and a clown.
Nick
Administrator
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Again what’s angering me is that nobody is pushing Duggins on the indemnity
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Posted exactly that on the Telegraph Facebook page. Why is he yet again allowed to come out with BS completely unchallenged?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
No one will. The real fly in the ointment here is the real possibility of promotion
