Bayliss? (1 Viewer)

lacesoutdom said:

Odd one, im sure its been covered, by why isnt the lad getting any games at preston? he sat on the bench a bunch, but hasnt even featured there for the last two?

i imagine he'll be pushing for a loan in January?

Click to expand...

Preston are winning games and have a settled midfield, why change it?

Bring him back prompto! Our CM stocks are bare...

Maybe we could get him back on loan? But tbh our midfield is stacked and we have perfectly good alternatives to Bayliss

Mad that he could be a premier league footballer by May

Wasn’t Maddison much the same when he first went to Norwich loaned out for a while too.

It's a striker we need, not another midfielder.
Baylis would only be sat on our bench now.

Magwitch said:

Wasn’t Maddison much the same when he first went to Norwich loaned out for a while too.

Click to expand...

Yes. Madders was also sold to the same manager. No coincidence. Expect to see Bayliss featuring more heavily in the championship next season.

Maddison out on loan

Similar thread here. A lot of people showing their football knowledge.

ccfchoi87 said:

Maddison out on loan

Similar thread here. A lot of people showing their football knowledge.

Click to expand...

Got better since he had a haircut

lacesoutdom said:

Just seems mad that you'd buy a players for a couple of mil, and not play him at all?

Click to expand...

Have him around the first team squad, few sub appearances to pick up the difference in pace and level. May go out on loan in Jan but won't be back here. From Preston's perspective better to pay 2m last summer and have his progress under your control than risk the price doubling next summer and more competition for his signature.

They’re nurturing him. Which is the right thing to do.

It was more Daniel Farke who started playing Maddison at Norwich wasn't it? Makes you wonder where Maddison would be now if Farke didn't turn up.

No guarantees Bayliss will get the same treatment

Mr Panda said:

It was more Daniel Farke who started playing Maddison at Norwich wasn't it? Makes you wonder where Maddison would be now if Farke didn't turn up.

No guarantees Bayliss will get the same treatment

Click to expand...

Ironically wasn't it O'neil at Norwich at the time that wasn't playing Madders?

Shipley is better anyway..........

lacesoutdom said:

Odd one, im sure its been covered, by why isnt the lad getting any games at preston? he sat on the bench a bunch, but hasnt even featured there for the last two?

i imagine he'll be pushing for a loan in January?

Click to expand...

Correction to the title of this thread: 10 Bags Bayliss.

Greggs said:

Shipley is better anyway..........

Click to expand...

Listen pal, Bayliss is the best football player on this Earth and Shipley is no more than Sunday League, I'm 7ft 5 and I'll knock you the fuck out if you wanna argue back.


And I'll rape your owl for good measure

They have a 35 year old playing in his position in the first team currently - doesn’t take a genius to work out the plan. But for now, the 35 year old is still playing out of his skin & so he just needs to bide his time.

Greggs said:

Shipley is better anyway..........

Click to expand...

Oh god...

Seems odd they didn't ship him out on loan straight away considering they have no U23 side.

Genuinely, and if I'm wrong I'd own up, think he is nowhere near as good as people suggest.

He never was and never will be close to the player Madderz is.

I don't even think he's much better than what we have now.

Tom Bayliss will not go any higher than the championship.

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk