well would you believe it? Germans very happy, although it remains to be seen if it is just nice words. I think he wants to build SUVs. Greens not to keen on that. The government will have to increase renewables if their CO2 aims are to be met as E cars need a lot of electricity. Greens want smaller E cars and more car sharing to get more efficient usage of cars. Some want cars to last longer to reduce need for raw materials. Aluminum needs high amounts of power to extract, but can be recycled efficiently.
The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (8 Viewers)
- Thread starter jimmyhillsfanclub
- Start date
well would you believe it? Germans very happy, although it remains to be seen if it is just nice words. I think he wants to build SUVs. Greens not to keen on that. The government will have to increase renewables if their CO2 aims are to be met as E cars need a lot of electricity. Greens want smaller E cars and more car sharing to get more efficient usage of cars. Some want cars to last longer to reduce need for raw materials. Aluminum needs high amounts of power to extract, but can be recycled efficiently.
Alan Dugdales Moustache
Well-Known Member
I have a 2005 Skoda Octavia 1.6 petrol..it has 110,000 on the clock. Last week it failed to start for the first time in 14 years. I've been researching electric cars and spoken to old school mechanics and those who specialise in electricals in newer cars. My question is this : Do I sell my old car for a new electric car, given the cost in raw materials, manufacture , transport etc , not to mention the lack of charging points. Or do I keep my old car , get it fixed and continue to get it serviced annually thus saving the planet in terms of resources.
My conclusion is that I should keep it until it is no longer economical to run. Yes, it pumps out more co2 than a newer model, but surely that's better than the cost to the environment in scrappage and having a whole car built, electric or otherwise.
Please pursuade me if you think I'm completely wrong. I'm open to any opinion.
My conclusion is that I should keep it until it is no longer economical to run. Yes, it pumps out more co2 than a newer model, but surely that's better than the cost to the environment in scrappage and having a whole car built, electric or otherwise.
Please pursuade me if you think I'm completely wrong. I'm open to any opinion.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
To an extent yes. However, if ypu are sharp enpugh you increase ypur prices a bit whilst fill g the gap of businesses that fold. It is basic opportunism
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sick Boy
Well-Known Member
Something that needs more awareness and investment in the UK is gas powered cars, better for environment and they pay for themselves in the long run.
I bought a ‘99 Audi A3 last month with LPG fitted and it does 350-400km for €20 - it’s a no brainer considering how much you save in fuel costs.
I also have an even older Fiat Uno that’s gas powered and does similar mileage for €8.
Astute
Well-Known Member
My old runner is now 11 years old. Use it as my long journey car. Volvo V70 D5. Done over 11,000 miles in the last 6 months. Has never failed an MOT. Only got 142,000 miles. Cambelt every 100,000 miles and easy to do. Service every 18,000 miles. If kept to the car should be able to join their club of cars that have covered over 300,000 miles.
Most cars won't cover anywhere near this. There is a lot of polution to build a car. Much more than the difference of pollution created between a new car and older car.
Astute
Well-Known Member
A 2014 article on a 20 year old car to a new one? So a 1994 car........
Engines from 2008 are much better than that. And my car with a large engine only costs £240 a year to tax so isn't very poluting to what many are.
How about finding a more recent one?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
I’m finding it hard TBH. Gut says you’re wrong about the emissions, read something about 80-90% of impact is from driving emissions and obviously mobile emissions are worse than static like production because less measures available to capture them.
But can’t find anything newer than that so you may be right. As I say it feels wrong on a gut level.
Astute
Well-Known Member
When cars were high polluting it was better to replace them. But the introduction of the DPF on diesels made a massive difference.
Yes they still pollute. But look at the energy on putting a car together. And making batteries for electric vehicles can be catastrophic in some countries. Then they need clean electric. Otherwise they still pollute.
Are EV battery plants creating more pollution than EVs eliminate?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
That research is a bit sus. It depends on fossil fuels powering the plant for a start.
For me the argument for going electric is we need mass market adoption for a host of reasons to drive down cost and improve usability. My next car will be fully electric (assuming my current one last for a couple for years).
Astute
Well-Known Member
But did you read about the battery part?
Electric car batteries damaging to environment: Amnesty International
This one is a long read but explains it very well
Will Your Electric Car Save the World or Wreck It?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yeah I’ve read the arguments before re child Labour and the like, I think they miss the point. Same as the “oh but you use fossil fuels to generate electricity”. All seems a little grasping at straws to me. Working conditions and recycling methods can be improved and aren’t a reason not to switch to a clearly better technology for a host of reasons. To be honest a lot of these articles and research read like puff pieces for ICE makers and related industries. I’ve not read many neutral studies that don’t conclude electric is the future even if it’s not perfect in every way. ICE is just an outdated technology and if someone suggested it today we’d laugh them out of the room IMO.
Astute
Well-Known Member
Yes it looks like the way forward. But if you look at the full impact you will see that the batteries are a major problem that they like to try and hide. It isn't just the child labour. A and we were talking about running an older car that isn't highly polluting against the pollution caused by building an electric car and batteries. And the big problem ahead is what to do with the used batteries. Less than 2% can currently be recycled. Suddenly we have millions of these batteries to sort out.
The spiralling environmental cost of our lithium battery addiction | WIRED UK
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
And as we humans do, when it becomes as big an issue as carbon emissions we’ll tackle it.
First things first. We need to tackle decarbonising transport. Everything else can wait. Battery tech and manufacturing methods will improve.
Astute
Well-Known Member
So what you are saying is we should make the cars better and concentrate on the batteries when this is done.
But what about the millions of batteries (Not small either) that can't be recycled as they degenerate over time? Put the effort into the power and the rest will be OK. But no. It is all about the cars and not the problems being created in 10 years time.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Hydrogen is the way forward, but it's hard to store I believe.
Plus enough people die crashing with a tank of petrol, never mind a hydrogen bomb in their car!
Ian1779
Well-Known Member
Nothing says let’s return to the days of the British Empire like ‘let’s break up the Empire’
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
We’ll find a use or shoot them into space or whatever. That’s tomorrow’s problem.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
I've heard if was hard to store as it tends to leak through even the smallest holes and it's also difficult to isolate. There's tons of it about but it likes to 'stick' to other stuff and those chemical bonds are tricky/expensive to break (according to a chemical engineer I know anyway - chemistry is not my strong suit!)
That was my opinion regarding the danger too, but supposedly they've made the tanks safe and they'd done stuff like fired tracer bullets into the tanks and crashed cars into each other etc without explosions. However, a few tests isn't the same as millions of people driving around in them or having the fuel transported.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I was reading something on hydrogen fuel cells not that long ago and I think the safe storage issues have largely been overcome and the main issue now is the physical size of the hardware and it not fitting into the available space of a functional car. There are a few companies experimenting with hydrogen trains though with a view put them into production in the not so distant future.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
I agree with you on the prevention rather than cure - if we know this is going to be a problem in the future surely it's best to just stop that problem now before it becomes one?
However, I'm also of the opinion that we will work on and find ways to fix these problems over time and if we can store these safely until we do then it is a potential goldmine of tomorrow.
I'm probably a bit of a mad futurist but I reckon in centuries to come there will actually be quite a bit of value in old landfill areas because they'll be full of materials and elements that have become scarce. We'll be digging up our own rubbish to recycle it.
Astute
Well-Known Member
A lot of the problems we have are yesterday's problems we are left with today. Like oil, petrol,diesel, nuclear waste and coal fired electricity. And look at the problems it is causing today.
Astute
Well-Known Member
I agree. But there is now millions of electronic vehicles on the road. They have batteries. In the future they should be able to work out the recycling. But as we know there will be no rush until made law.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
Yeah...something tells me that the water vapour emitted will fill our skies...& warm the atmosphere...& we will be crashing said hydrogen powered vehicles as we will eventually be in a permanent heavy mist.
Maybe they will develop something(s) to get around it all
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yep because we aren’t half as smart as we think we are. We can’t predict most externalities. But we are smart enough to innovate our way out of issues when they become serious enough to throw resources at IMO.
Constantly waiting around for the perfect answer (and hydrogen is far from perfect) will mean nothing gets done.
Astute
Well-Known Member
So we should push ahead with something we know is a major problem without putting more effort into finding a way of it not being a major problem for our children?
Sounds just like where you are happy for future generations to be made hundreds of billions in debt because it might be affordable.
We are where we are because of a lack of knowledge on what pollution would harm the most. The first lot of dead batteries will be a reality soon. But we will have the reality of millions each year soon and not a clue what to do with them.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
Rather startling...given many of ypur arguments & likes regarding Brexit predictions
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Grendel
Well-Known Member
well you certainly aren’t
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Inaction is also action. We know that inaction has major problems, hydrogen has major problems and electric has major problems but is ready now and those problems aren’t as immediate.
When we have that reality there will be an economic incentive to deal with it, and we will. The beauty of capitalism.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Economics is reasonably well developed, unlike electric car battery recycling. We have a pressing need to “leave” internal combustion engines ASAP that makes it less important to judge risk.
Just imagining you in a burning house:
“Oh, interesting that you want to leave right away Sharon, when you spent weeks planning our fortnight in Florida and poo pooed my idea of just catching the first plane out of BHX”
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
Who the fuck is Sharon? As far as examples go that is probably your worst.
Car battery to power car is a pretty specific thing where changing outcomes can be analysed & alternative better outcomes sought. Though the impact of batteries on the environment is recognised.
Economics is a constantly changing scenario with more influences than it possible to put a number on.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Fair. The point you avoided about the need for change altering the level of planning you can afford to do still stands.
Sharon if my imagined wife for you. Sharon and Bazza seemed to fit.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
I see Arron Banks’ Twitter DMs have been leaked. Coming out in dribs and drabs but already seen cash for journalists, Raab apparently confirming a pact with the Tories, and £1000 for lunch with Priti Patel. Andy Wigmore scrabbling around threatening legal action for anyone who touches them so sounds like they aren’t denying them.
Last edited:
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Is that how much to avoid having lunch with her?
