tbf you help to contribute to that!
I agree on a philosophical level but, what do you do? The soft options antagonise hard righties, and end up with the country worse off than under the current status quo and will therefore antagonise dribbling europhiles (although worth noting that for one such europhile, Ken Clarke has made mighty steps to try to compromise his beliefs to help the country move forward. If only some of the righteous righties had been prepared to do the same, eh!). So... you still end up having a sizeable number who 'lose' in the compromise situation that pleases nobody.
Ultimately, it's been bungled too much, and it needs some bravery to take a step back and re-set. The goivernment needs to consult with the opposition and reach a consensus, if that isn't possible then we need some indicative votes for preferred way forward and, if they don't work, we need a number of options put on the table to the people... but that's a very complicated public vote, and arguably too complicated so therefore we shouldn't even get to that stage.
Parliament's system is too black and white really. They had the chance when they did indicative votes last time but, really, having failed to get a majority for anything, there ought to have been the chance to knock out the tailenders and run the votes again, looking for that consensus.
