Jeremy corbyn (1 Viewer)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Just like yesterday when Matt Hancock was asked how the Tories are going to build the 40 new hospitals they're talking about.
He said the money will come in the future- imagine a Labour shadow minister coming out with an answer like that.
Good news though that the housing shortage is going to be solved by architects starting to use computers and work in 3D :facepalm:
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I see your boys have come to save you even though your post makes no sense.

How unusual.

What are you on about you mentalist?

My post is taking the piss out of your phrase “knocking the UK” by pretending the UK is a person and someone is knocking it.

I then make the point that it’s not Remainers (who get told they are doing the knocking) who want large scale change of the UK, implying they are actually OK with the UK and the ones “knocking” it are Leavers.

I thought this fairly obvious joke was obvious, but there you go.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Esther McVey, the housing minister no less, is encouraged that architects are using 3d computers to make 3d houses using computers.

I expect this will get the same coverage as Diane Abbott.
 

xcraigx

Well-Known Member
The silence is deafening.

Labour planned £10 for 2020 I think? The Tories are planning £10.50 by 2024 so about a 5% increase year on year. The headline may make both offers sound similar but they're not. The Tories also have form for announcing similar (£9 by 2020 for example) which won't happen.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Labour planned £10 for 2020 I think? The Tories are planning £10.50 by 2024 so about a 5% increase year on year. The headline may make both offers sound similar but they're not. The Tories also have form for announcing similar (£9 by 2020 for example) which won't happen.

Actually the manifesto merely states that they would increase the NMW to the Living Wage (which is expected to be at least £10 by 2020). It doesn’t say whether they would do this immediately or whether it would be phased in.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Actually the manifesto merely states that they would increase the NMW to the Living Wage (which is expected to be at least £10 by 2020). It doesn’t say whether they would do this immediately or whether it would be phased in.

As soon as they take power - confirmed today.
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Some people are going to loose their shit at this Tory proposal same as they did when Labour proposed similar

National Living Wage to rise to £10.50, Javid says

Or maybe not. It’s probably a good idea now.
Not losing anything over this. I don't accept it as a good thing anymore now, than I did when Labour announced similar.
In the end it sets up a spiralling of inflation to pay for it, pay rises for those in the middle to redress their pay differential, & will leave the lowest paid back at square 1...being unable to afford to live properly just like they are now.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Parking the increase to one side, the important thing for me is removing the separate 21-24 year old band. For lower paid jobs there shouldn’t be a discrepancy whether you are 21 or 40....in actual fact there might well be a fair few where you’d happily pay a younger person more (I know you’re not allowed...it’s ageist)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Parking the increase to one side, the important thing for me is removing the separate 21-24 year old band. For lower paid jobs there shouldn’t be a discrepancy whether you are 21 or 40....in actual fact there might well be a fair few where you’d happily pay a younger person more (I know you’re not allowed...it’s ageist)

Agreed. Though why not 18? If you’re paying tax at full rate why not get paid at full rate?

Worth pointing out that in reality the increase is roughly what it’s been the last couple of years anyway, and I’ll believe the Tories have suddenly become the workers party when I see it quite frankly. Same as if Corbyn suddenly came out with a massive defence plan.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Agreed. Though why not 18? If you’re paying tax at full rate why not get paid at full rate?

Worth pointing out that in reality the increase is roughly what it’s been the last couple of years anyway, and I’ll believe the Tories have suddenly become the workers party when I see it quite frankly. Same as if Corbyn suddenly came out with a massive defence plan.

Yeah, no issue with 18 either. If they’re good enough to land the job then why not. Apprentices are a different case though as they’ll be being trained, course costs covered etc
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Yeah, no issue with 18 either. If they’re good enough to land the job then why not. Apprentices are a different case though as they’ll be being trained, course costs covered etc

I was an apprentice on £300/mo at 16 and thought I’d hit the jackpot :D

As long as they’re actual apprenticeships that lead to a decently paid, skilled job, I’m fine with that. TBH I’d have a vocational version of uni with student grants and better esteem for trade skills. But that’s another conversation.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I was an apprentice on £300/mo at 16 and thought I’d hit the jackpot :D

As long as they’re actual apprenticeships that lead to a decently paid, skilled job, I’m fine with that. TBH I’d have a vocational version of uni with student grants and better esteem for trade skills. But that’s another conversation.

Far better than shovelling 50% of kids into uni, apprenticeships + is a good way forward (for individuals and country)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Far better than shovelling 50% of kids into uni, apprenticeships + is a good way forward (for individuals and country)

Couldn’t agree more. Uni should go back to being for the 25%ish it’s actually suitable for, everyone else should get the offer of business startup support or vocational on the job training (and the latter should include stuff like police and nurses as well as software engineering that really don’t need a degree).

And you should be able to bank it for later on in life. I could talk forever about post 18 education though.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Said it before - we need to get rid of the stigma of 'two tier' education from things like grammar/comprehensive all the way up to uni/vocational training/apprenticeships. Both are extremely valuable tools in obtaining skills and getting people to reach their potential, just a different method to suit the individual

It is branched, not tiered. Only reason it's seen as tiered is because in the past it gave those fortunate enough to go to uni (usually due to where the were schooled rather than ability) an excuse to earn more.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
Said it before - we need to get rid of the stigma of 'two tier' education from things like grammar/comprehensive all the way up to uni/vocational training/apprenticeships. Both are extremely valuable tools in obtaining skills and getting people to reach their potential, just a different method to suit the individual

It is branched, not tiered. Only reason it's seen as tiered is because in the past it gave those fortunate enough to go to uni (usually due to where the were schooled rather than ability) an excuse to earn more.
It's certainly created a different dynamic. For some relatively "lower" type jobs, because there are so many uni students, employers are looking for a degree just to get on the starting line. If 50% of young people have a degree of sorts, then this is a useful filter to exclude the other 50%. Never used to be the case. With crap "O levels I was able to get an Engineering apprenticeship. Was able to work my way up, competing with BSc's and Honours colleagues to eventually become Head of R&D for a world-wide manufacturer. My education would not now even get me the lowest job in the department.
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
Abbott to cover for Corbyn on prime ministers questions this week,That should be worth a watch.
:kiss::happy::banghead::playful:
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member

You've not being watching the Tory party conference or are you deliberately ignoring the continuous streams of fuck ups by the Tories?
LGs post refers to Ester McVeys car crash speech though personally I think James Cleverley claiming the Tories invented the NHS beats it .

Got to feel sorry for Priti Patel, announcing the UK will introduce a points based immigration system when we already had one was fairly idiotic but she still couldn't out stupid her colleagues.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Couldn’t agree more. Uni should go back to being for the 25%ish it’s actually suitable for, everyone else should get the offer of business startup support or vocational on the job training (and the latter should include stuff like police and nurses as well as software engineering that really don’t need a degree).

And you should be able to bank it for later on in life. I could talk forever about post 18 education though.
I don't disagree but the problem with that is that universities are big commercial organisations and provide a significant numbers of people with jobs, and, given that the Tories in particular are determined to make the UK unattractive for why foreigner the students are going to have to come from somewhere.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Got to feel sorry for Priti Patel, announcing the UK will introduce a points based immigration system when we already had one was fairly idiotic but she still couldn't out stupid her colleagues.
Announcing the tories as the party of law and order and declaring "To the criminals, we are coming after you" while the conference is on lockdown for 20 minutes so armed police can remove Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP who has started a punch up is up there as well.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I don't disagree but the problem with that is that universities are big commercial organisations and provide a significant numbers of people with jobs, and, given that the Tories in particular are determined to make the UK unattractive for why foreigner the students are going to have to come from somewhere.

I don’t see why they can’t do things like Cov Uni College and the WMG Academy but with the funding and quality of Degree courses TBH. Just because it’s not a degree or structured like a degree doesn’t mean it doesn’t need delivering by someone. And we’ve basically killed off most of FE at this point so it may as well be HE.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
You've not being watching the Tory party conference or are you deliberately ignoring the continuous streams of fuck ups by the Tories?
LGs post refers to Ester McVeys car crash speech though personally I think James Cleverley claiming the Tories invented the NHS beats it .

Got to feel sorry for Priti Patel, announcing the UK will introduce a points based immigration system when we already had one was fairly idiotic but she still couldn't out stupid her colleagues.

Would be nice to know if Patel’s family would have made it in under such a system
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Agreed. Though why not 18? If you’re paying tax at full rate why not get paid at full rate?

Sounds fair to me! You can pay full tax fund a war & fight in a war...only right that whatever the job you do you should get paid according to how well you do it regardless of age?

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Not losing anything over this. I don't accept it as a good thing anymore now, than I did when Labour announced similar.
In the end it sets up a spiralling of inflation to pay for it, pay rises for those in the middle to redress their pay differential, & will leave the lowest paid back at square 1...being unable to afford to live properly just like they are now.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

And yet, that’s not actually what happens in practice is it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top