The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (13 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Grendel

Well-Known Member
any Brexit deal gets passed in Parliament is not going to go to a referendum.

Of course it isn’t
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Most tories voted to remain - it’s a small minority that didn’t

We have a minority government so the Tories need to keep the bloc of Brexiteer MPs they have.

Again, a soft Brexit isn’t even on the table and even if it was, I’d say I agree with the argument that it isn’t exactly what the people who voted Leave had in mind. To me, a soft Brexit is worse than remaining, but I could live with it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member
So why would you do anything differently? Been listening to Mart and SB?

We haven't left the EU. We won't be leaving this month without a deal. The EU said hardly anything would change for at least a year if we did leave for their benefit not ours.

So why ask these questions?

What have I said on the subject? Apart from possible problems for UK airlines flying inside the EU as in my link. I haven’t mentioned private driving licenses or visas being a problem as I don’t think they are, at least for this year.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
PM’s spokesman: “The Speaker did not forewarn us of the content of his statement or the fact that he was making one.”
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
May trying the same sort of things the EU are accused of doing strangely enough
You mean they are both doing the same thing?

All these cosy chats between them. May says she has a new deal. Then the EU says nothing has changed. Time has about run out. EU offers a long extension of between 2 and 4 years. We accept it. And during this long extension we end up remaining in the EU in everything but name. Or we end up remaining.

Leaving and having no ties with the EU isn't going to happen now.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
PM’s spokesman: “The Speaker did not forewarn us of the content of his statement or the fact that he was making one.”

There was a motion to stop a third attempt. It was withdrawn because it was the job of the speaker to rule. The speaker said he would rule on it. It is a 400 year convention. He has made a preliminary ruling with 2 days warning before the proposed vote. Every one knew that as it was said in parliament.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
good news

Yes indeed. May goes to EU to ask for extension to avoid no deal.

EU says yes as long as it includes people’s vote.

Labour says it will accept May‘s deal with amendment that includes it will be put to a vote at the people‘s vote.

May’s deal is accepted with the amendment and with the help of labour votes.

May goes back to the people with the questions: 1. remain or leave and then 2. if we leave, do we leave via the only deal on the table ( May‘s deal ), or no deal? Votes only count when both questions answered.

I can’t see anything more democratic than that.

The ERG and their fans are frightened of a people’s vote, which acknowledges that the will of the people is against Brexit. The mood has changed. The „we won, get over it“, is now „ for god‘s sake don’t let the people have a vote“.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Much like Bill Cash eh...?

Funnily enough the speaker is following a 400 year tradition of a sovereign parliament. Not surprised at all at the rage of poorly educated/ ill informed leavers. I thought one of the main reasons for leaving , apart from immigration ( dislike of foreigners), was sovereignty. Bercow is applying the rules of a sovereign parliament.

Maybe it was just dislike of foreigners after all?
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
Funnily enough the speaker is following a 400 year tradition of a sovereign parliament. Not surprised at all at the rage of poorly educated/ ill informed leavers. I thought one of the main reasons for leaving , apart from immigration ( dislike of foreigners), was sovereignty. Bercow is applying the rules of a sovereign parliament.

Maybe it was just dislike of foreigners after all?

It's a dislike of foreigners running a country they neither live nor work in.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
It's a dislike of foreigners running a country they neither live nor work in.
There is a dislike throughout Europe on how they rule all the countries in the EU. Even the deniers know this is the case. That is why they all call for reform. But there won't be reform as they hold all the power and only promote others to the top jobs that have the same ideals.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
There is a dislike throughout Europe on how they rule all the countries in the EU. Even the deniers know this is the case. That is why they all call for reform. But there won't be reform as they hold all the power and only promote others to the top jobs that have the same ideals.

If the UK leaves there are many who say reforms will be easier for the EU to get through. You keep on about people wanting reforms as if everyone wants the same reforms and an evil body is stopping the reforms. People want different reforms. To get reforms passed you need a majority, or in some cases, a unanimous decision because of veto rights. It is called democracy. Without the UK‘s veto rights, it may be easier to introduce things like a fiscal union, or an European army, should they be wanted by the rest of the EU.

Apropos top jobs: Any comments on May‘s appointment of her loyal lieutenant as head of the UK civil service? Thought not.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
It's a dislike of foreigners running a country they neither live nor work in.

We are part of the decision making process of EU law. Other EU countries could use that argument about the UK being involved. It is called pooling sovereignty. The EU doesn’t rule the UK, there is a sovereign parliament. There are foreigners at the UN, other foreigners have signed up with us to the Geneva convention, others will defend us if we are attacked via NATO and we have less influence in the foreigner dominated WTO than in the EU. Funny that the only foreigners you don’t like being involved with are our biggest trading partner and our closest allies in the fight against international crime.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
It's a dislike of foreigners running a country they neither live nor work in.

Leavers when asked cited immigration and sovereignty as the two main reasons for voting leave. Wanting less foreigners suggests you don’t like having too many foreigners around. Seeing as leavers also blame foreigners for everything from crime to potholes, lack of affordable housing etc, I get the impression that a dislike of foreigners was a strong motivation for leave voters.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Yes indeed. May goes to EU to ask for extension to avoid no deal.

EU says yes as long as it includes people’s vote.

Labour says it will accept May‘s deal with amendment that includes it will be put to a vote at the people‘s vote.

May’s deal is accepted with the amendment and with the help of labour votes.

May goes back to the people with the questions: 1. remain or leave and then 2. if we leave, do we leave via the only deal on the table ( May‘s deal ), or no deal? Votes only count when both questions answered.

I can’t see anything more democratic than that.

The ERG and their fans are frightened of a people’s vote, which acknowledges that the will of the people is against Brexit. The mood has changed. The „we won, get over it“, is now „ for god‘s sake don’t let the people have a vote“.

We've already had a peoples vote, no thanks
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top