Yes you are being too cynical. Lets see the council step up for a change. Are they prepared to go in to talks to establish what is meant by help and reasonable terms or will they just dismiss it out of hand because its SISU irrespective of the potential damage to the football club.
Are you really going to play that dumb on this? Just look at the Wasps planning application and the assistance the council gave to them prior to it being submitted.
I bet there are a few worried at the council, hence the desperation I've been pointing out for weeks while you go on about conspiracy
it has explained a lot.
There is nothing concrete in the regs about a distance. These are the relevant regs. Presumably the EFL adjudged any plan submitted so far (if any) as being inappropriate. I heard within 8 miles of council house a few years ago and I remember a Fisher statement about a site slightly further than this which I can't locate at present, more recently a distance of 6 miles has been mentioned.
The only reason I could see that they can't is that the negotiations were with private sellers and the signed a NDA or something that could only be revealed to legal professionals.
For me it doesn't matter if we believe it or not. We've wanted the legals dropped, here is the olive branch. If it turns out to be a load of BS what do we lose, we're hardly going to be worse off.
There's pr for you
Mentioned before all these people who are dead against appeals and the legal action continuing would suddenly change their mind if by some miracle it went SISUs way at some point.
It's all too convenient. There's empty rhetoric and peevish whining, but nothing to actually go on.
That is not in the CCC area, it is Rugby.
That's where the frustration comes from. It gives the council the opportunity to back sisu in to a corner. Either they have to build a stadium - great, or they prove sisu have no intention of doing it and are bullshitting - great. Nothing to lose but they'll just say "we can't discuss this due to ongoing legal action" and nothing will change.
This is why the trust and everybody else needs to be demanding things. It is going to show a few agendas up if they won't.
Aren't they trying to do that on their own already?
I have no problem with a potential new home for the club being built at the lowest possible cost. Obviously not the actually building itself in the unlikely event it ever happened, don't want the roof falling in during a game!
They don't need us remember. Stadium is doing just fine and are contribution counts for little. Just like when Lucas kept telling us ACL was 'washing its face'.
Fisher made a statement once that Ryton land (referring to old Peugot factory site) was too expensive.
You are being pro council as always
