The goal (1 Viewer)

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Yeah, but it's JCH. Nuff said.

Thats the only time I can think of JCH going down yesterday. How much more dangerous did he look staying on his feet ?! If he played like that every week he’d be one of my first picks, as it is maybe impact sub for last 30 mins could be his calling
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Thats the only time I can think of JCH going down yesterday. How much more dangerous did he look staying on his feet ?! If he played like that every week he’d be one of my first picks, as it is maybe impact sub for last 30 mins could be his calling
He was a different animal yesterday wasn't he.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Wasn’t long after he came on. Looked like he was fouled...having said that I didn’t have the best view as it was far side of the pitch/area so may be some city bias (however it’s not as if JCH ever goes down easily so stonewall in my book !!!)
 

Nick

Administrator
Wasn’t long after he came on. Looked like he was fouled...having said that I didn’t have the best view as it was far side of the area so may be some city bias....it’s not as if JCH ever goes down easily so stonewall in my book !

I think I can remember but can't remember a massive pen shout?

JCH never goes down easily?
 

Spurs 'City Away Kit' Kit

Well-Known Member
When JCH stays on his feet he’s far more effective, it feels like refs have it in their heads that he goes down too easily so doesn’t get the call when he’s genuinely been taken out.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
The goal was offside
Offside call from Powell is a joke. The Lino missed at least 3 clear offsides against their forwards in the second half. Hence the ironic cheer when he finally signalled one.

The goal was offside (5.58). Also, looking at the replay of the big offside call against Southend, I'm assuming that their player in the middle wasn't deemed active (7.56). Clear penalty missed (1.55), though

 

SBbucks

Well-Known Member
The goal was offside


The goal was offside (5.58). Also, looking at the replay of the big offside call against Southend, I'm assuming that their player in the middle wasn't deemed active (7.56). Clear penalty missed (1.55), though


The goal was offside


The goal was offside (5.58). Also, looking at the replay of the big offside call against Southend, I'm assuming that their player in the middle wasn't deemed active (7.56). Clear penalty missed (1.55), though


Offside? Nonsense, it's impossible to tell from that angle and viewpoint. Looks about level on the Sky footage, so onside.
 

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
The goal was offside


The goal was offside (5.58). Also, looking at the replay of the big offside call against Southend, I'm assuming that their player in the middle wasn't deemed active (7.56). Clear penalty missed (1.55), though


Check out @stevefloyd ’s post earlier in this thread. Not offside. Case solved.
 

mark82

Moderator
The goal was offside


The goal was offside (5.58). Also, looking at the replay of the big offside call against Southend, I'm assuming that their player in the middle wasn't deemed active (7.56). Clear penalty missed (1.55), though



That's a definite penalty at 1:55. With the position of the referee and the linesman on the opposite side you can see how it was missed.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Offside? Nonsense, it's impossible to tell from that angle and viewpoint. Looks about level on the Sky footage, so onside.

Frankly, I think Powell is clutching at straws here. If it is offside, it’s very marginal. He claimed they got ‘stronger and stronger’ and created the ‘better chances’. That’s a worrying assessment in my view because they didn’t threaten us at all but for one or two chances. He spins it as their goalkeeper made ‘one save’, that one save was top notch and kept them in the game. I thought we were average, to be frank, but Southend looked even more distinctly average. One thing I like about Robins is that he seems to make pretty grounded comments, even when we lose.

An excerpt from Powell’s post-match comments:

“Nathan Bishop had maybe one save to make, and we had the better of the chances but you’ve got to take them”. Utter nonsense.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Frankly, I think Powell is clutching at straws here. If it is offside, it’s very marginal. He claimed they got ‘stronger and stronger’ and created the ‘better chances’. That’s a worrying assessment in my view because they didn’t threaten us at all but for one or two chances. He spins it as their goalkeeper made ‘one save’, that one save was top notch and kept them in the game. I thought we were average, to be frank, but Southend looked even more distinctly average. One thing I like about Robins is that he seems to make pretty grounded comments, even when we lose.

An excerpt from Powell’s post-match comments:

“Nathan Bishop had maybe one save to make, and we had the better of the chances but you’ve got to take them”. Utter nonsense.

Southend only really looked dangerous that last few minutes.

We were clearly the better side in that second half and as soon as we scored one we were pressing hard for another.

We deserved the victory.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Southend only really looked dangerous that last few minutes.

We were clearly the better side in that second half and as soon as we scored one we were pressing hard for another.

We deserved the victory.

My thoughts exactly. Southend probably had the best chance of the first half from the corner, but that’s it.

I’m not going to rant and rave about our performance, because I thought we were average too. A Southend said it was a ‘0-0 game edged by the home side’ and that’s a reasonable assessment, we created, and scored the only clear cut chance of the game. Three points in the bag, job done.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Bayliss in desperate need of a rest. Winner and the assist for the winner in 2 matches.

About time.

He has doubled his tally for both in 2 matches.
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
About time.

He has doubled his tally for both in 2 matches.
Coinciding exactly with Robins dropping that negative deep set up and getting the ball down to play a bit of football. Who would have though an attacking midfielder would be more effective in an attacking team with people making runs in front of him, rather than receiving the ball 10 yards outside of his own box. He's not been in the best form but his own game was also hampered by having Doyle behind him and JCH in front.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Check out @stevefloyd ’s post earlier in this thread. Not offside. Case solved.

That's not the offside point. This is (note, screenshoot after the ball has been played forward by Kelly, to Bayliss, in an offside position):
OFFSIDE.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SBbucks

Well-Known Member
That's not the offside point. This is (note, screenshoot after the ball has been played forward by Kelly, to Bayliss, in an offside position):
View attachment 11257
Let's see a screen shot as the ball is played, not afterwards, looking across the pitch in line with the last defender. Then you have a chance of proving if it is offside or not. That shot proves nothing.
 

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
Let's see a screen shot as the ball is played, not afterwards, looking across the pitch in line with the last defender. Then you have a chance of proving if it is offside or not. That shot proves nothing.
Yep...I’m with you on this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top