Phone in (1 Viewer)

Otis

Well-Known Member
Aye, think it was Paul, asking Clive to get down the training ground and get some answers from Slade.
What a novel idea!!

The CWR/manager interviews are nothing short of an embarrassment.

No-one has even asked Slade if he feels his job is in danger, which has been the obvious question to ask since we lost to Swindon.
 

steve82

Well-Known Member
What a novel idea!!

The CWR/manager interviews are nothing short of an embarrassment.

No-one has even asked Slade if he feels his job is in danger, which has been the obvious question to ask since we lost to Swindon.

You'd of thought that would of been asked by now, not evenany comments from the board about the last 2 months and how things have spanned out.... not even a vote of confidence yet or we will assess the situation in due course... nothing. It's all very strange.
 

Bob Latchford

Well-Known Member
The final 1 made me laugh . Clive , you have to be quick Rob , we're nearly out of time. okay Clive, Erm ,well, yeah , right , let's have it right , erm , here goes , so ... :banghead:
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
I know Paul - dyed in the wool Sky Blue lad (with an incredible collection of Sky Blue memorabilia). He is spot on about the lack of probing questions by the CWR team. As fans, we are full of passion,angst and frustration at the end of (most) games, and to then hear Geoff (bless him) ask 'I see you switched formations at half time' but then not follow up with ''Did you get it wrong' , 'why not attack from the outset'. etc etc. 90+% of the questions are fawning. We, as fans, don't have the opportunity to grill the manager and it's galling when they don't. Paul may have been a bit OTT with 'I wan't you to humiliate the manager' - but I get that he wants our frustration given a voice.
 

Bob Latchford

Well-Known Member
'I'm worried there might be trouble at Wembley'

'Do you think the fans should protest?... Yes' :banghead:
Yes that made me laugh and he thinks there should be banners etc :banghead::banghead: ,the isis 1 too :banghead: it's not as if he hasn't used that term before either :banghead::banghead:
 

Bob Latchford

Well-Known Member
I'd actually prefer to be owned by ISIS, at least their end is nigh unlike bloody SISU.
At least that reference made me laugh, God it's depressing supporting this shower of horseshit
Hang in there fella , I've heard SISU shan't be around for very long . they came close to going last season .
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
I know Paul - dyed in the wool Sky Blue lad (with an incredible collection of Sky Blue memorabilia). He is spot on about the lack of probing questions by the CWR team. As fans, we are full of passion,angst and frustration at the end of (most) games, and to then hear Geoff (bless him) ask 'I see you switched formations at half time' but then not follow up with ''Did you get it wrong' , 'why not attack from the outset'. etc etc. 90+% of the questions are fawning. We, as fans, don't have the opportunity to grill the manager and it's galling when they don't. Paul may have been a bit OTT with 'I wan't you to humiliate the manager' - but I get that he wants our frustration given a voice.
So many questions and I bet we could all conjure up half a dozen or so decent questions in seconds.

'So, where do you think it went wrong today?'

You took such and such off in the second half, what was the thinking behind that?'

'You went 4-4-2 today, but then changed to wingbacks. Why did you change it?'

'Are you now beginning to feel the pressure as manager?'

'Do, you feel your job is safe?'

'Such and such wasn't even in the squad today. What was the reasoning behind that?'

'What is the injury situation with?' (lists players)
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
So many questions and I bet we could all conjure up half a dozen or so decent questions in seconds.

'So, where do you think it went wrong today?'

You took such and such off in the second half, what was the thinking behind that?'

'You went 4-4-2 today, but then changed to wingbacks. Why did you change it?'

'Are you now beginning to feel the pressure as manager?'

'Do, you feel your job is safe?'

'Such and such wasn't even in the squad today. What was the reasoning behind that?'

'What is the injury situation with?' (lists players)

Agree Otis. Geoff generally does the interviews, and I don't know if he has that passion/drive/ whatever in him to ask tough probing questions. Wasps, aside, I know he is a rugby man, and whilst he may have feelings for the City? it really doesn't come across. I'd much sooner Paul/Juggy/ other passionate fan (who has been to the match) was allowed to grill him post match live on air. Far more satisfying. (Grendel can too, even if it is under a pseudonym!)
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
We could have also asked what was the thinking in playing 4 centre backs... why isn't Bigi playing is it because of triggers in contracts... updates on injured players... why now keep playing loan players pick the possible future team not a makeshift team... Geoff might be a lovely bloke so is my Dad but I wouldnt want him doing interviews either
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Paxman opener " Tim Fisher, you've overseen 2 relegations, a complete breakdown in trust with a dwindling fan base and a club that appears to be on the brink of self destruction. Other than being completely inept, what can you offer supporters in your own defence ?"

Clive "Tim. can you shed some light on the latest financial account for the club ?"
 

Houdi

Well-Known Member
Twice a week on Sky,before mid-week matches,and weekend matches Premiership managers pre-match interviews are shown on Sky. virtually every question you've heard a million times before, so have the managers,and most of the answers have been heard countless times before.
Last season when we were flying under Mowbray ,he could have read a Janet and John book after the match,and I doubt most fans would have cared a jot. Have a run like Slade has had, and fans aren't going to be appeased by anything he has to say.
Ask Slade why he picked a certain team, and he will always be able to give reasons why, its just when you are constantly losing that fans won't agree with his selection or tactics. Why didn't you pick player A,answer he took a knock in training,or he had looked 'leggy' in training. Why did you pick player B, answer he had look really sharp in training,etc etc. Why did you pick player C at full back instead of player D?,well I wanted a bit more physicality at the back to counteract the oppositions long ball style. The problem is when the team are play poorly and the results are terrible,every answer a manage gives, just comes across as blah,blah,blah to fans. The only answer Slade could possibly give to appease the fans is,I'm resigning.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I think geof is just a nice timid guy in real life
Geoff is a massive supporter of local sports and has been with the BBC for nearly 25 years. What he isn't is a Paxman style journalist who is going to put pressure on those he is interviewing. I don't have a problem with that but it really needs someone else in the local media to step up to that role.

Shane O'Connor seemed a likely candidate until he was removed in somewhat suspicious circumstances.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Geoff is a massive supporter of local sports and has been with the BBC for nearly 25 years. What he isn't is a Paxman style journalist who is going to put pressure on those he is interviewing. I don't have a problem with that but it really needs someone else in the local media to step up to that role.

Shane O'Connor seemed a likely candidate until he was removed in somewhat suspicious circumstances.

O'connor interviewed fisher many times to be fair and despite lots of pressing on issues he never made any real headway.
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
You'd of thought that would of been asked by now, not evenany comments from the board about the last 2 months and how things have spanned out.... not even a vote of confidence yet or we will assess the situation in due course... nothing. It's all very strange.

Don't t forget Timmy said that we'd be hearing much more from him, that was back in December but i have barely heard a peep from him since then.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
O'connor interviewed fisher many times to be fair and despite lots of pressing on issues he never made any real headway.
Probebly because Tim was giving head, and had a mouthful so could not answer.
 

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
After todays match, I listened to the interview with Slade, with the usual numbness provided by C & W, who, of course, insist that they have to plot a middle course.
Imho, the middle course would be somewhere between hanging Fisher, or putting him in the stocks at the Bulls Head. A balanced point of view my arse, more like don't rock the boat.
The total lack of constructive opinion was blatant, from the ex-PE teacher, gross ineptitude is forthcoming from all of his words.
Of course, this is the man selected by Fisher, (who has a great knowledge of football), what a crock of shit !!!!
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
After yesterdays 0-0 does that make Slade an okay manager so let's see what happens or still a useless arse who needs getting rid of
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
I wish Rob Gurney would come back! Even his commentary made us feel like we were winning, even if we weren't! That was true passion!
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
O'connor interviewed fisher many times to be fair and despite lots of pressing on issues he never made any real headway.

But at least the right areas have been explored and Fisher has had the opportunity to clear matters up. It helps prove Fisher hasn't got the answers and is the wrong man to turn things around at Coventry. Fisher can only be deemed right for the job if the policy is to make Coventry fail.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top