Keys on talk sport (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2477
  • Start date

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
No it's not actually. If you're talking about my campaign it was originally to try and get the owners to realise the damage they were causing to our football club. When I found out they didn't give a damn about us that's when I didn't give a damn about them. If I could I would destroy their business and them personally but I can't. What I can do is keep fighting for the club I love

No I just meant the sisu out campaign from the CT. Seems to be based on something and if it's a Coventry based consortium as keys suggests then maybe this is what the telegraph know about hence the past week actions.
 

LB87ccfc

Member
Keys saying Sepella already rejected one offer was referring to Hoffman and co's laughable attempt previously, nothing new here.
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Keys saying Sepella already rejected one offer was referring to Hoffman and co's laughable attempt previously, nothing new here.

Oh I see the one where they wanted ticket money or something? That was 3 years ago plus.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Says theres people in the city who want to take over the club but wont get involved with sisu
That'll be Hoffman and Elliott then.
Said seppala has all ready refused one offer
I'm not really a fan of doing everything through the press but if this is true, and assuming it was a serious offer and not something like we'll give you a pound and you have to walk away writing off all the debt, why would you not go public after your offer had been turned down?
The fans would get behind you, the CT certainly would and it would lend huge weight to the campaign asking SISU to sell if we knew for a fact there was a viable alternative.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Exactly, a lot more will be behind it with the plan they can see.

Unless it's a Hoffman special. Why hold it back?

Commercial confidentiality. :p
 

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
from what i've heard there are viable 'live' alternatives out there,
afccoventry's recent post concerning a conversation he had with a man in the city,
ref sisu borders on some directly relevant facts,
it would therefore appear the stumbling blocks are,
persons who have held sway for too many years, whilst CCFC fall further into the football abyss,
why have they allowed this to happen ?
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
from what i've heard there are viable 'live' alternatives out there,
afccoventry's recent post concerning a conversation he had with a man in the city,
ref sisu borders on some directly relevant facts,
it would therefore appear the stumbling blocks are,
persons who have held sway for too many years, whilst CCFC fall further into the football abyss,
why have they allowed this to happen ?

I don't understand. What are the stumbling blocks? Sisu won't sell?
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
Mpwbrays resignation might just push sisu/Sepalla over the edge left with the prospect of having to employ a new manager and the financial implications of that. Was told Monday they are almost skint as a company gone down from 30 odd employees to 8 and a lot of their investors gone
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Mpwbrays resignation might just push sisu/Sepalla over the edge left with the prospect of having to employ a new manager and the financial implications of that. Was told Monday they are almost skint as a company gone down from 30 odd employees to 8 and a lot of their investors gone

Surely just don't hire another manager and just get ricketts if money was that bad. Don't doubt they are in trouble but who says they have to pay for another manager. They don't have to if they don't want to
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
Surely just don't hire another manager and just get ricketts if money was that bad. Don't doubt they are in trouble but who says they have to pay for another manager. They don't have to if they don't want to
Ricketts is the type and at the age to want to be a manager, but would be a mug to take it with the knowledge of the situation here.
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Surely just don't hire another manager and just get ricketts if money was that bad. Don't doubt they are in trouble but who says they have to pay for another manager. They don't have to if they don't want to
Hence MV is favourite to take over permanently according to the Daily Telegraph. Thought it would be SISU preferred option as it combines roles...ultimately reducing overall cost!

...onwards & upwards PUSB
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
Ricketts is the type and at the age to want to be a manager, but would be a mug to take it with the knowledge of the situation here.
I don't see why not
TM made mistakes but the majority blamed SISU 100% so Ricketts would get a free pass
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
Hes a cock jockey.Only comes out of the woodwork to spout off when somethings happened. Never see or hear of him otherwise. A bit like a NOPM with a sniff of a semi final ticket.
TBF, the media go looking for him as soon as something happens, on account of him
Being a City fan, famous ( sort of ) and always ready and willing to talk.
I don't care for him much, but get the impression a lot of City fans really dislike anyone
Who puts their head above the parapet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top