More from Anderson (1 Viewer)

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
http://www.coventrycity-mad.co.uk/n...lair_at_diamond_club_lunch_883752/index.shtml

The final guest of the day was the Chief Executive Officer of the club, Chris Anderson. Chris took over the reins after the departure of Steve Waggott last November. Chris opened his speech to the assembled members by asking, “What can I tell you about Coventry City Football Club?” a rhetorical question to those fans who each have supported the club for 50 years or more.


Chris said he felt incredibly lucky to have the job at Coventry City. He said it had been a privilege to meet the people from outside the club in the city community. He emphasised that the club is now in his own words, ‘in a very good way’ and that it was a wonderful club to work for. He praised the organisation of the recent Jimmy Hill memorial service in the cathedral last month, saying it was a wonderful and moving event.


Anderson.jpg

Chris then went on to talk about the importance of the football club to the city and the community. He identified three areas that he saw as vital for the success of the club. Firstly, he said the club needed to be a high performing sports club. Secondly, as a business it needed to be like all other businesses and make money through being run properly and efficiently and selling a high quality product. Thirdly as a community institution with the Sky Blues in the Community and Academy being at the forefront of promoting the club.


Mr Anderson said that if the club thrives, the community would also thrive. He said the club is having a good season despite the recent dip in form and performance on the pitch and was confident that if the club did not achieve promotion this season, it would do so next season.


He said the accounts had been filed on time, that off the field the club was doing well, and that at last it was a self-sustaining business. He was far from complacent though and admitted that there is still a lot of work that needs to be done, and reiterated that to be successful will take time. He spoke of the time when Jimmy Hill first came to the club it took a lot of hard work and some time to achieve success.


He used the phrase that Tony Mowbray used that it was a priority to get out of ‘this wretched division’.


Joe asked whether Chris preferred the academic or practical aspect of his career, to which Chris said he preferred doing the practical work rather than teaching. He praised the football management team of Tony Mowbray and Mark Venus, saying they were doing very well.


He then spoke of the commercial side of the club stating that generally there was now nothing wrong that cannot be fixed, but each problem needed to be worked on one at a time. He said it was his aim to leave the club in a far better position than when he arrived.


Joe then asked the prickly question about the ownership of the ground. He questioned the different positions of the owner Joy Seppala, who had previously stated that it was vital for the success of the club to own its own ground and his own opinion that it was not vital for the club to own its own ground and that the club could work with the stadium’s owners, Wasps RUFC.


Chris Anderson said that the club needs to control its own destiny but it was his opinion either that the club could do so as a tenant or if it owned its own ground. He admitted that currently the club was not in control of its own destiny and that it needed a long term home, but he did not think it mattered too much whether that was as owners or as tenants. He emphasised that the Ricoh was built for Coventry City Football Club, the seats are sky blue, there is a statue of Jimmy Hill outside the stadium and that there is a memorial garden within the grounds. He did admit that there is a lot of work that needs to be done on the question of a ground before the club would be in control of its destiny. He stated that the club needed to work closely with the council to achieve a successful outcome.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The guy seems to talk sense. Now we just have to wait and see if he comes good on what he has been saying.
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
For me at the moment he is just saying what people like to hear, there's talk and there's action, let's wait for the action.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
He talks the talk OK. Time will tell if he walks the walk. I'll reserve judgement for a while longer yet but what he talks is refreshing when compared to the waffle that went before him.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
For me at the moment he is just saying what people like to hear, there's talk and there's action, let's wait for the action.

Looking again at the event article it wasn't the place to be negative.
We need to get into them at proper feedback events.

Just want to know the plan !
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
What did he say the plan was ?
Seems waffle to me.

What he's saying is that all options are open and ownership is not an overriding factor. Isn't that what we've all been asking for? Lets look at all the options and decide the best way forward based on the facts available.

Not saying he will follow through but I much prefer the conciliatory noises that he is making rather than the flying off the handle type responses we are used to from Fisher and Waggot.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
What he's saying is that all options are open and ownership is not an overriding factor. Isn't that what we've all been asking for? Lets look at all the options and decide the best way forward based on the facts available.

Not saying he will follow through but I much prefer the conciliatory noises that he is making rather than the flying off the handle type responses we are used to from Fisher and Waggot.

Is that you Chiefdave ? :)
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
I went to that meeting at the Royal Warwicks. club in town, sounds like a repeat performance to me, i did ask a question and regret not being a bit more forthright and direct he won't get off so lightly next time and also I'll make sure the mic is turned up.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
I went to that meeting at the Royal Warwicks. club in town, sounds like a repeat performance to me, i did ask a question and regret not being a bit more forthright and direct he won't get off so lightly next time and also I'll make sure the mic is turned up.

Project Badass in full swing.
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
I like the guy, met him and he seems genuine - but as others on here have said, it's one thing to talk a good game, but a whole different ballgame to "walk the walk", as many of our managers and directors have found since relegation from the Prem, onwards.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Does it matter what he says as he must have a blonde ladies hand up his arse and if he doesn't do what she wants off he goes with all the other failed CEO's apart from one who seems to hang around in the back ground talking about some fantasy ground every year or so.
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
Does it matter what he says as he must have a blonde ladies hand up his arse and if he doesn't do what she wants off he goes with all the other failed CEO's apart from one who seems to hang around in the back ground talking about some fantasy ground every year or so.

Doesn't sounds like that to me, as he's taken a very different stance to her on the idea of renting at the Ricoh, for instance.

Also, be fair, hard to call Waggott a failure as CEO (see below comment)

gift of the gob and absolutely nothing more, he brings nothing to the table just like his predecessor did.

The predecessor who signed Tony Mowbray and co, and got us back to the Ricoh?
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Doesn't sounds like that to me, as he's taken a very different stance to her on the idea of renting at the Ricoh, for instance.

Also, be fair, hard to call Waggott a failure as CEO (see below comment)


Waggott was a total disaster, we are back at the Ricoh because it suited other parties to get us back and the club knew they couldn't survive elsewhere he rode on the back of that while keeping an inept manager and playing football manager signing dozens of hopeless players.

He doesn't seem to have argued too much when she said the sums didn't add up just sold a player instead and who approved the budget based on 11k the previous disaster

Sorry deleted your bit about TM as I had typed in the middle of it and didn't want to type it again it's no to try to make the comment disappear:facepalm:
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I was initially more than willing to give Anderson time, but he has been in place 5 months now & apart from agreeing to extend the Ricoh deal another 2 years the only other things of note to have happened in that time is a steady decline in the club's on field fortunes and sale of their main playing asset.

So far I'm not impressed & I've certainly got no idea of his vision for the medium term future of the club.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
What the hell does it matter what colour the seats are? What matters is whether we win the game or not.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
What the hell does it matter what colour the seats are? What matters is whether we win the game or not.[/QUOTE

I am with you on this I sit on it I don't look at it so the colour doesn't matter to me if they change them I really don't care
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
He did admit that there is a lot of work that needs to be done on the question of a ground before the club would be in control of its destiny. He stated that the club needed to work closely with the council to achieve a successful outcome.

Not sure what the reference to the Council is about? I thought Joy had sworn never to deal with them again, and had got her wish as far as the stadium is concerned.
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
I was initially more than willing to give Anderson time, but he has been in place 5 months now & apart from agreeing to extend the Ricoh deal another 2 years the only other things of note to have happened in that time is a steady decline in the club's on field fortunes and sale of their main playing asset.

So far I'm not impressed & I've certainly got no idea of his vision for the medium term future of the club.

Hes not a magician! He's got nothing to do with what's happened the last two months on the football field.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
Hes not a magician! He's got nothing to do with what's happened the last two months on the football field.

Do you think he had nothing to do with the decision to sell Maddison that seems to have effected team morale adversely?

OK maybe you don't see it that way, but I get the impression that something in the general atmosphere has changed since his arrival that has indirectly impacted team performances.
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
Do you think he had nothing to do with the decision to sell Maddison that seems to have effected team morale adversely?

OK maybe you don't see it that way, but I get the impression that something in the general atmosphere has changed since his arrival that has indirectly impacted team performances.

Over the moon about this Jodi Jones signing, exactly what we should be doing buying young promising talent with first team experience for a Fee! Hopefully a sign of things to come. Don't give two cahoots about Maddison anymore.

Quite te frankly the most positive news in years is the accounts show we are a sustainable self sufficient business ( albeit heavily reliant on match day revenue). Onwards and upwards.

Give the guy some time, don't be so judgemental.

regarding morale and atmosphere at the club, win today and at 5pm could be a very different buzz about the club.

Yes it can change that quickly!
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
Over the moon about this Jodi Jones signing, exactly what we should be doing buying young promising talent with first team experience for a Fee! Hopefully a sign of things to come. Don't give two cahoots about Maddison anymore.

Quite te frankly the most positive news in years is the accounts show we are a sustainable self sufficient business ( albeit heavily reliant on match day revenue). Onwards and upwards.

Give the guy some time, don't be so judgemental.

regarding morale and atmosphere at the club, win today and at 5pm could be a very different buzz about the club.

Yes it can change that quickly!

Yeah, maybe it is smart wheeler dealing, the club needs to be doing that. Transfer activity has to turn a profit.

I am not so confident that the club is as yet quite self sustaining, there was a £2M hole in the last accounts, but if we reach the play off final this season then I'd expect there to be a small profit in the next figures.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Quite te frankly the most positive news in years is the accounts show we are a sustainable self sufficient business ( albeit heavily reliant on match day revenue). Onwards and upwards.

Except the accounts show nothing of the sort. They show

- losses of £3m even after £2.7m in transfer fees (there wont be such sales every year although in year to 31/05/16 following the sale of our only significant asset there will be)
- that the Gross assets of the club have decreased by 1/3 or £500k
- that Gross liabilities have increased by £2m
- that the club is reliant on the interest and debt owed to the owners not being called in
- that the club is reliant on match income and significant player sales, and therefore success on the pitch is vital to maximise both
- that the owners provided an extra £780k in funding - so we must have been at least that short of self sustaining
- we still don't have security of tenure and access to some income streams
- that the club are still in a deep hole
- that the rate of decline has slowed but it is still a decline (see the above)

We are also told that our break even is 14k per game attendance we are short of this so far this season so losing probably £35k per game if the owners assertion is correct

Apart from that yes the club is self sufficient :facepalm:

It is better yes but self sustaining certainly not
 
Last edited:

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
F
Except the accounts show nothing of the sort. They show

- losses of £3m even after £2.7m in transfer fees (there wont be such sales every year although in year to 31/05/16 following the sale of our only significant asset there will be)
- that the Gross assets of the club have decreased by 1/3 or £500k
- that Gross liabilities have increased by £2m
- that the club is reliant on the interest and debt owed to the owners not being called in
- that the club is reliant on match income and significant player sales, and therefore success on the pitch is vital to maximise both
- that the owners provided an extra £780k in funding - so we must have been at least that short of self sustaining
- we still don't have security of tenure and access to some income streams
- that the club are still in a deep hole
- that the rate of decline has slowed but it is still a decline (see the above)

We are also told that our break even is 14k per game attendance we are short of this so far this season so losing probably £35k per game if the owners assertion is correct

Apart from that yes the club is self sufficient :facepalm:

It is better yes but self sustaining certainly not

I wonder if the break even going up has something to do with SW going. Not so much in the sense that he went because he got it so wrong but because we have a huge settlement to pay because he's gone? How long was left on his contract? Was Madison's premature sale the price of getting rid of SW?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top