Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Jim's latest activity
Jim
replied to the thread
It's the hope that gets you
.
Seven years ago if someone had offered you 7/8th in championship and having been a toenail from the FA cup final, you would have snapped...
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Question for a stato
.
An important question would also be how many goals / points we’ve been gifted by mistakes from the opposition.
Friday at 3:03 PM
Jim
reacted to
mmttww's post
in the thread
Simms + Wright = ?
with
Like
.
Friday at 9:57 AM
Jim
reacted to
HuckerbyDublinWhelan's post
in the thread
Callum O'Hare
with
Like
.
I don’t see an issue with his celebration - he scored and tried to rouse and fire the crowd straight after. the thought that his mind...
Wednesday at 10:25 AM
Jim
replied to the thread
Ipswich
.
Wednesday at 10:19 AM
Jim
reacted to
Sky_Blue_Dreamer's post
in the thread
VAR needs an overhaul
with
Like
.
In the stadium at the time it didn't bother me that much, mainly because I (naively) assumed that the decision was made pretty quickly...
Wednesday at 9:57 AM
Jim
replied to the thread
Peter Bankes needs investigating
.
So the ref that gave us the penalty and didn’t call the goal offside…?
Wednesday at 9:39 AM
Jim
replied to the thread
Watch along
.
Fuck the bed! 😂
Tuesday at 4:49 PM
Jim
reacted to
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee's post
in the thread
Actions have to have consequences
with
Haha
.
Fucking hell, you are boring.
Tuesday at 4:35 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Media Reaction to FA Cup Semi Final
.
You’re still a prick.
Tuesday at 3:23 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Peter Bankes needs investigating
.
Now if I were trying to generate an accurate measure to the nearest centimetre that would be a perfect point. I’m not though. I’m...
Tuesday at 3:12 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Peter Bankes needs investigating
.
I’m not betting my life though. I’m proving that messiahs claim of a foot onside is nonsense. For that to not be true the pitch would...
Tuesday at 3:09 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Peter Bankes needs investigating
.
I’ll also add - take a look at any photo of the Wembley pitch over the years. The accuracy of the grass pattern is spot on.
Tuesday at 3:05 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Peter Bankes needs investigating
.
The same operation that marks out the pitch…. Or do we think the lines are all out of kilter too?
Tuesday at 3:04 PM
Jim
replied to the thread
Peter Bankes needs investigating
.
The point was to show that the earlier claim of Wright being a foot onside was clearly nonsense. The mow lines would have to be way out...
Tuesday at 2:59 PM
Home
Members
Top