Recent content by fatso

Ellis Simms and JDS

Yea ok mate,

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy5e6ly9qq3o Proof your talking your usual bollocks. New government spending commitments are almost always followed by increases in taxes or borrowing. Your living in cuckoo land if you believe differently. Your post has one thing right, any government...

100% agree. Between fractional reserve banking and quantative easing the whole global financial system is a corrupt scam designed to keep the bankers in control. The banks lend money they don't have and charge interest on that non existant money that keeps the working class in jobs they don't...

Outdated, maybe. But if his theories worked, the whole world would have adopted them.

His theories don't stack up in the "real world" wage and price inflation, tax avoidance by the wealthy and corruption at senior levels saw to that.

Rediculous way of avoiding the most obvious question. Clearly you have no answer. You should apply for Rachel Reeves's job.

It's not, but at least the overspend would be justifiable as it's on desperately needed infrastructure. Labour piss money away on nonsense, such as giving away British sovereign soil, as in the Chagos Islands (which were ours) and then paying millions to lease it back!!!! And don't even...

Well you can only produced the money promised by raising taxes, or by further austerity, or by irresponsible leanding or by shaking the mythical money tree and printing extra money out of thin air. (ie quantitive easing with all the negative consequences involved) So which of the above...

That's a lot of carbs for an off season footballer to be eating! Hope he doesn't put too much weight on.

The issue we have is that the infrastructure spend has (historically)largely been done on completely pointless projects, such as the Thames flood barrier, HS2, millennium dome etc etc While at the same time we've neglected our power infrastructure and water supply systems, two vital pieces...

So are you seriously suggesting that quantitive easing is the correct way to go?

Where's the money coming from?

"The Children Act"

Influential, maybe. Potential, definitely £32m is probably an investment and a bit of a gamble, you don't get much at PL level for that money, and that's the level he is tipped to get to. He's 19, 6'2" tall, already quite strong and plays for England at U21 level. He's got good...