I don't entirely disagree, but the frustration is that Ipswich get (or seem to get) a degree more of these decisions than other clubs.
There was minimal contact, not enough to impede the striker, who went to ground anyway. Even if technically the wrong decision had not been made, then it's a very soft 'correct' decision, and one that encourages players to exaggerate minimal contact and go to ground. The ref had actually let a fair few physical challenges go; the decision was not in-keeping with how he'd refereed the rest of the game.
Compared with some of the penalties we were not given, some of those Ipswich in particular do get stick in the craw.