Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (15 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
Was my previous post too cryptic for some? šŸ˜‚
I mentioned it on Friday. No-one said anything and now suddenly people are talking about David Mitchell. šŸ¤Ŗ
Ā 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
Far too quiet and almost normalised,it seems that Trump can get you're card's turned off imagine that,three cheers for maga!šŸ˜ŽšŸ«£
Ā 
Brighton Sky Blue

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Suing his own government agencies to shake down the American taxpayer

apnews.com

Trump sues IRS and Treasury for $10 billion over leaked tax info

President Donald Trump is suing the IRS and Treasury Department for $10 billion. He accuses them of failing to prevent a leak of his tax information to news outlets.
apnews.com apnews.com

Filing trademarks for airport names to further shake down taxpayers for naming airports after him

apnews.com

Trump family business files for trademark rights on any airports using the president's name

The Trump family company wants to trademark the use of the presidentā€™s name on any airports but says it doesnā€™t plan on charging a fee ā€” at least for a proposed renaming of one near his Florida home.
apnews.com apnews.com

Corrupt dickhead should be in prison.
Ā 
Flying Fokker

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
We're hearing from Vice-President JD Vance who has called the ruling "lawlessness from the court, plain and simple".

"Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to 'regulate imports', didn't actually mean it," he wrote on social media.

"[The rulling's] only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency," Vance said.
Ā 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Flying Fokker said:
We're hearing from Vice-President JD Vance who has called the ruling "lawlessness from the court, plain and simple".

"Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to 'regulate imports', didn't actually mean it," he wrote on social media.

"[The rulling's] only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency," Vance said.
Click to expand...
So dangerous them dissing the Supreme Court
Ā 
Brighton Sky Blue

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
If fair elections are held and a Democrat wins, so many of these criminals in the Trump regime should be put on trial. Mass trials for the ICE goons as well.
Ā 
Brighton Sky Blue

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
How many of them do you think have done that out of interest? I get that that there should be a few who are rightly put before the courts, but mass trials sounds very heavy.
Click to expand...
I believe huge numbers have violated the 4th amendment to the US constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Anyone who has apprehended people, gone into homes, workplaces etc and hasn't produced a warrant signed by a judge based on probable cause that they've committed a crime, has violated that right. The high profile cases of ICE agents murdering US citizens go without saying.

It would at this point be easier to list the crimes that have not been committed by this regime and its subordinates than the ones they have. The president himself is deeply, deeply corrupt and the 'border czar' Tom Homan was recorded accepting a 50 grand bribe in a brown paper bag. We could go on and on.
Ā 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I believe huge numbers have violated the 4th amendment to the US constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Anyone who has apprehended people, gone into homes, workplaces etc and hasn't produced a warrant signed by a judge based on probable cause that they've committed a crime, has violated that right. The high profile cases of ICE agents murdering US citizens go without saying.

It would at this point be easier to list the crimes that have not been committed by this regime and its subordinates than the ones they have. The president himself is deeply, deeply corrupt and the 'border czar' Tom Homan was recorded accepting a 50 grand bribe in a brown paper bag. We could go on and on.
Click to expand...

The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.

Other than being a bit heavy, which I agree there has been some evidence of, you are not going to see mass trials of people who were doing a job you don't agree with. I have said before that I also agree that ICE needs to be reformed and a few should be made an example of, but mass trials seems very heavy.
Ā 
SBAndy

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.
Click to expand...

This sounds dangerously close to ā€œhe had it comingā€ which you and others were up in arms about regarding Charlie Kirk.
Ā 
Brighton Sky Blue

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.

Other than being a bit heavy, which I agree there has been some evidence of, you are not going to see mass trials of people who were doing a job you don't agree with. I have said before that I also agree that ICE needs to be reformed and a few should be made an example of, but mass trials seems very heavy.
Click to expand...
Itā€™s difficult to take this post seriously to be honest. The rights in their constitution arenā€™t up for debate and these have been violated countless times.
Ā 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
The cases against the 'protesters' probably won't get very far. Whilst Pretti shouldn't have been killed, there's a reason the story has disappeared from the front page overnight. The guy was a violent antagonist and has been on video attacking law enforcement. It is unlikely those officers will be prosecuted.

Other than being a bit heavy, which I agree there has been some evidence of, you are not going to see mass trials of people who were doing a job you don't agree with. I have said before that I also agree that ICE needs to be reformed and a few should be made an example of, but mass trials seems very heavy.
Click to expand...
You see the Irish guy story?
how many more of those are there?
No right to a fair trial
No right to innocent until proven guilty
No right even to know what law youā€™ve broken
Ā 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Itā€™s difficult to take this post seriously to be honest. The rights in their constitution arenā€™t up for debate and these have been violated countless times.
Click to expand...

It's difficult to take the 'mass trials' post seriously. It's the kind of thing you would see on Reddit.

I have said multiple times I agree that some of the ICE agents need to be struck off, and the system needs reform. If you think they are just going to shut it down and throw everyone in prison then I suspect you are going to be in for a shock.
Ā 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total:Ā 15 (members:Ā 0, guests:Ā 15)
Top