Recent content by Otis

That needs to change. They obviously watch the game, but they don't need to micro analyse everything. As I keep saying, yesterday was the perfect example and no-one can say anything other than it was impossible to say "onside or offside" on first viewing of that still, because it was so close...

They'll be up for it. I just think they will lack the stamina to see the game through. I think we will start off well, but then struggle and fade as the game wears on. Best scenario is that we go a couple of goals up early on and then try and see the game out. I do honestly think we will...

There once was a lad called Robins A bloke just like you and like me He took us to the brink But then just watched it all sink As we thought we'd won the game 4-3

VAR looks at an incident and if it looks too close to call to the naked eye, you go back to the on-field officials original ruling. Anything that needs a slide rule and minutes of analysis, should be dumped. It would be much fairer than having no VAR at all and wouldn't pee people off as much...

VAR will always be shit for as long as they keep using a toenail as a metric .

Nope. Try the Man U forum.

No. It would be common sense though to implement it that way. I have consistently said, VAR needs fine-tuning and changing, because as it stands, it is detrimental to the game

It needs to be, Pete.

F*ck em. 🤪 Come on Stretto!!!

No, I'm fine. I didn't go though. Mind, in saying that, I went to the Luton game and I was fine after that too. Sad, but just more of an "oh well" from me, because I felt Luton were the better side. I may well have felt different had I have gone yesterday.

Exactly. VAR can work, but it certainly isn't working they way they are implementing it. It's become ridiculous.

Nope. In that scenario yesterday, no. It's such a close call isn't it. So, I think, as VAR, you look at it and if it's that close, you go with the on-field decision. So if the linesman raised his flag, that's what you go with. There wasn't enough evidence to overturn it. Should be like in...

And look where the linesman is. Right in line with it.

In order to get an un-contested divorce, we had to have an agreement and that was the only thing my ex would agree to. If it was contested, it would have cost us around 15 grand each. The thing that made me roll my eyes in all this was that she got everything, so the house (worth £230k), the...

Again, I get what you are saying, but no-one, I repeat, no-one, could say looking at that still, that there was a clear and obvious error. There would still be some ambiguity in general for sure, but we CAN make it better. That yesterday should never have been overturned. No-one can defend that...